Archive for the ‘Book Reviews’ Category

Learn how to invest, read stock analysis, and find stock picks

Investing Book Review: Quality of Earnings

Investing Book Review of Quality of Earnings

Quality of EarningsIf you’re into value investing, which of the three financial statements do you concentrate on the most?

I tend to perform balance sheet analysis and cash flow statement analysis much deeper than the income statement. I would guess that you do the same.

That’s where this gem of a book Quality of Earnings comes in. Thorton L.O’Glove has written an absolutely brilliant investment book for the DIY investor.

The fact that hardly anyone has ever heard of this book cements the fact that you will have an edge after reading this book.

For the Enterprising Value Investor

I first came across this investing book while reading The Art of Short Selling, and if a highly acclaimed fundamental short seller highly recommends a book on financial statement analysis, I’m all over it.

First of all, the book is perfect if you are willing to read, go through reports, write some numbers and do some simple math.

If this sounds like too much work… at least the advice is timeless.

Quality of Earnings

As the title of the book suggests, the main focus is on earnings and the quality behind it.

The first 5 chapters deals with the reason why you shouldn’t trust analysts, auditors, letter to shareholders and disclosures in the annual report.

It’s not just a simple discussion though, consistent with the entire book, the author provides examples galore. He even goes through a letter to shareholders and compares what the CEO said to the actual results.

Now that’s what I call holding your hand and walking you through the details!

Financial Statement Analysis Techniques

Earnings are highly manipulative, especially because the GAAP rules are so broad. This undeniably leads many companies to overstate their earnings through aggressive accounting methods.

Wall Street only focuses on the final EPS that is quoted in the press release and at the bottom of the income statement, but O’Glove leads you through methods on what to look for and the simple math you should perform in order to compare with the previous years.

Ever asked yourself the following questions?

  • What should you do with non-operating and non-recurring income?
  • How do you analyze the status of a company based on declining or increasing expenses?
  • What is the difference between shareholder reporting and tax reporting?
  • How do you analyze accounts receivables and inventory?
  • How should you analyze debt and cash flow?
  • Do dividends matter?
  • How do different accounting methods affect the value of a company?

The book will help answer all of the above questions.

Why this is Relevant and Important

The obvious time you ask all the questions about a company is before you purchase it. But the lessons in the book help you to identify the flaws before it comes out in public. This could mean saving yourself a lot of money by selling a deteriorating position.

e.g. by examining the difference in growth between raw materials, finished goods and accounts receivables, you will have a good indication that a company will write down its inventory.

Summary

Quality of Earnings is a great book if you want to deepen your understanding of analyzing companies and valuation.

The book may be old but the techniques and advice contained within is timeless.

Earnings Power Value EPV and Book Review

Greenwald EPV Value Investing

It took me a year or so to purchase the book and then another month or so until I finally got around to reading it but Value Investing: From Graham to Buffett and Beyond is definitely a great addition to the serious investor. Rather than a “book review” it’s more of a discussion on Greenwald’s valuation methods.

If you are new to investing or lack confidence in reading the financial statements and making adjustments to the numbers, then skip this one for now and try looking into either F Wall Street or Five Rules for Successful Stock Investing.

Quick Overview

The book is broken down into 3 parts.

  • Part 1: Introduction to value investing
  • Part 2: 3 Sources of Value
  • Part 3: Profile of 8 value investors

After reading a few sentences of part 1 and part 3, I immediately skipped over it. Nothing new to add to the already vast quantity of books defining value investing, the pros and cons of DCF, and some background info on value investing greats.

The sole reason I bought the book was for part 2 alone so let me get on with it.

Part II: Three Sources of Value

The section starts off with why DCF valuation is unreliable, and then goes over a 3 step valuation technique to mitigate the risk of making too many predictions associated with discounted cash flow analysis.

The three described are:

Benjamin Graham’s asset valuation.

Basically the same as Graham’s Net Net Working Capital asset valuation except Greenwald includes some adjustments to the balance sheet to include other assets such as property and goodwill in special cases.

Greenwald also refers to this as the Reproduction Value.

It is called reproduction because it is the amount a competitor would have to pay to obtain all of the required assets in order to be able to compete.

e.g. (Just using any wild number as an example) If I was to go through the balance sheet of Coca Cola and came up with an adjusted (reproduction) asset value of $100 with a market value of $300, an upcoming Pepsi will see that he only has to invest $100 to create an enterprise with a market value of $300. Just a crude example but I hope you get the point.

Earnings Power Value

The formula for Earnings Power Value is based off Graham and Dodd’s earnings assumptions that current earnings correspond to sustainable levels of distributable cash flows and earnings level remains constant. You will see that the formula also ignores growth. There is no variable for growth.

EPV = Adjusted Earnings x 1/R

where R is the cost of capital. The cost of capital can be a WACC or a simple discount rate assumption that I like to use.

EPV provides an intrinsic value by smoothing out earnings to ignore one time charges, resolve discrepancies between depreciation and amortization and capital expenditures, making adjustments based on the business cycle and other details which involves more hands on work.

Sounds simple enough, but you’ll have to work through the income statement to get a proper number for earnings.

When you arrive at an EPV for a company and if the value is lower than the reproduction value, you know that management is doing a bad job of using its assets to produce the level of earnings it should.

The second case is when EPV = asset value. This will occur in industries where there are no competitive advantages.

Lastly, if EPV exceeds asset value, you’ve likely found a company that has competitive advantages.

Take KO as an example again. Above I  mentioned that the asset value was $100 but the market value was $300. The difference of $200 is the competitive advantage it has over the competition. Pepsi may think it can reproduce the same type of results but the advantage KO has on the industry makes it virtually impossible to topple it off the top.

Value of Growth

Growth as a variable isn’t emphasized in the book as it leads to a lot of uncertainty but he goes on to discuss how growth can lead to economic destruction or added value.

This is because growth has to be supported by additional assets and to get those additional assets, you have to use the distributable cash which will reduce the value of the firm. If the company doesn’t have the competitive advantage, then the returns off the new investment will only be enough to offset the cost, effectively making it a zero gain.

Disadvantage of EPV

I like the fact that EPV doesn’t consider growth or too many variables but the one problem that I see with Earnings Power Value is that it uses earnings. While DCF has many variables, using the free cash flow numbers in my opinion will always be better than earnings.

e.g. Enron had great earnings all the way up to its collapse but FCF foretold the troubles long before the scandal surfaced.

But since the whole purpose of the book is to first go through the assets, followed by the EPV and then considering whether growth adds value, I would say it’s a solid stock valuation method.

Great Book to Study

The characteristic of great investing books is determined by the clarity of the examples and how well it leads the readers through the examples.

Value Investing: From Graham to Buffett and Beyond does a great job.

It goes through the 3 step valuation process for WD-40 and Intel in a very detailed step by step process. Definitely not a book you can read just once or without a pen and paper. It’s more like a mini-text book or a study guide to value investing but work through the book taking notes and highlighting key points and you’ll be on your way to mastering another great valuation method.

Also a good idea would be to go through the book with Bruce Greenwald’s EPV lecture notes on the topic. The diagrams and point form will help out in the understanding.

Investment Book Review: F Wall Street

The last proper investment book review I wrote was on The Art of Short Selling. Since then I’ve read a few investing and non investing books but of the investment books I went through, nothing was worth writing about.

Too Many Bad Investment Books On the Market

The Only Three Questions that Count by Ken Fisher was rubbish and I gave up half way. I didn’t find it helpful in any investing or behavioral finance areas. The foreword by Jim Cramer should have rung an alarm. I much prefer Philip Fisher’s Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits.

I also would have enjoyed Contrarian Investment Strategies a lot more had it not been so redundant.

So a big pile of frustration was lifted when I received F Wall Street: Joe Ponzio’s No-Nonsense Approach to Value Investing For the Rest of Us. Forget Wall Street? Fudge Wall Street? or what ever you wish to call Wall Street, F Wall Street provides an indepth look and discussion of what Wall Street is really after (your money), how you are better off investing on your own, how to value businesses, how to manage your portfolio and more. Let me try and go through it briefly to whet your curiosity.

F… Wall Street

This book is targeted towards the beginner to intermediate investor but is still a great read for the advanced. It is an easy to read book that doesn’t try to lose you in jargon and an overwhelming mess of formulas and symbols.

What I especially liked about the book is how it addresses many of the topics that other investing books do a terrible job of or refuse to go into. Topics such as how to value a business, how much to buy, tracking your businesses and when to sell.

Book Structure

The book is structured into four sections.

The first part deals with the basics. Issues such as Wall Street myths, stock market perceptions, mutual funds, risk and how businesses and their stock grow. Joe is able to take the boring and dryness out of the common finance topics and explain it in a clear and easy to understand manner. The simple to understand examples certainly do help in conveying the message.

Second, it looks at how to approach investing from a business perspective. Meaning, stocks are small pieces of business. Not speculative lottery tickets. Joe introduces us to the concept of “price follows value” as well as how to value a business by reading the financial statements.

Again, even a high schooler would do better in school to read this book when it comes to ease of understanding.

Are you still apprehensive and overwhelmed when thinking about financial statements? Then start reading this book.

It continues on to a simple yet detailed and full blown discussion of Buffett’s owner earnings, with examples in JNJ, MSFT and ABT. Joe also kindly explains how to use Excel’s present value function. I’ve yet to come across any other investing book that tries to help you calculate the intrinsic value of a company like this book does.

I found the third section to be very interesting. All about managing a portfolio.

When to buy, how much to buy, keeping track of your businesses, when to sell and a good section on workouts and arbitrage. My first arbitrage of Tribune corp is also in the book :)

The final and fourth part discusses the psychological aspect of investing. Investors are classified as “The General Conventionalist”, “The Enterprising Conventionalist”, “The Safety Seeker” and “The Non-Conventionalist”. As I’ve mentioned a few times long ago, an investor is successful when they understand who they are and what style they fit. A nice look at bonds and patience wraps up the book.

Summary

In case you haven’t noticed, I really enjoyed this book. I didn’t have the time to read it in one sitting, but it took about 6-7 20min sessions to see it through.

This book is now my number 1 or 2 recommendation for all new to intermediate investors and earns its place on my very selective recommended reading sidebar, where even The Intelligent Investor doesn’t have a place.

Go get F Wall Street: Joe Ponzio’s No-Nonsense Approach to Value Investing For the Rest of Us now.

Investing Book Review: The Art of Short Selling

(This post first appeared on The Div-Net)

Description

The Art of Short Selling, by Kathryn Staley, is by no means about short selling. If I had to sum it up in a few words, I would say the book is focused on hardcore fundamental analysis. It points all readers in the direction of discovering and analysing fundamental problems with a company. The book clearly states that one should never short a good company with temporary issues or just because a company seems overpriced.

There is no mention of technical analysis, trends or volume. The true method of short selling described is based on an extremely detailed fundamental analysis, which is why I immediately purchased the book. The book describes everything that enterprising investors should do.

I watched a video of Kathryn Staley talk about short selling and what it involved and was blown away by how little I was doing in comparison. Did you know that she shorted the same company on and off for ten years! Now that’s confidence, conviction and an understanding of the company. Something that everyone, especially me, can benefit from.

The Art of Short Selling does not teach you how to short stocks. What it does try to show is what to look for in the industry, business, management and financial statements to detect a company that is on the verge of a fundamental breakdown.

Make Up of the Book

The book immediately starts off by stating that fundamental short sellers look for quality of earnings, quality of assets and quality of management. As fundamental long buyers, we probably don’t go beyond 1 or 2 of these.

The first part of the book describes the aspect of short selling, what it is, how opportunities exist, statistics and profiles of great short sellers such as Jim Chanos.

Part Two is made up of 7 chapters. It takes the reader through many examples and situations of which industries and businesses are attractive for short sellers. This whole section is one case study after another which helps the reader to understand what to look for and how the concepts were applied.

As I was reading chapter 9, I couldn’t help but be spooked of the similarities between what happened to American Continental in 1988 and the warning signs from that era and the current economy. The danger signs were clear for anyone to see. If I had read this book 1 year earlier, I certainly would have done things differently.

The final part of the book is dedicated to the characteristics a short seller must have, a brief history lesson on previous market controversies such as the South Sea Bubble and a checklist and guide for fundamental short selling such as where to look, the bare requirements for what you must read, how to determine quality, which ratios will help to detect financial shenanigans and a list of questions you need to ask yourself as you go through the proxies and statements.

As you can see, this is some serious analysis and why I now view true fundamental short sellers as such a scary bunch.

Opinion

I found the book to be very helpful in my learning process but this book certainly isn’t for the beginner investor. If you have a desire to learn how to detect errors in the financial statements and find evidence in supporting documents, this is for you.

Whether you have a interest in short selling or not, this book will give you an idea of how much work is needed for any thorough investment as well as the conviction and patience required.

[tags]short selling, book review, investing[/tags]

Book Review: Good to Great

(This post was featured on The Div-Net)

Good To Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Other Don’t

As a young guy interested in business and wanting to start my own, I found Good to Great interesting and the ideas, although not new, to be thought provoking. C.S. Lewis once wrote that the best teachers are the ones that are able to remind you rather than try and teach you new things. If this is true, Jim Collins has done an excellent job of reminding the reader of the necessities of what is required for a business to be great.

Although the book is not a investment book, the principles and ideas can equally be applied to investment decisions.

A group of 20 people and research spanning 5 years filtered out 11 companies from 1435 public Fortune 500 companies that had been operating for 15 years with stock price performance on par with the benchmark but then beat the market exponentially for the following 15 years. The book then provides a case for the compelling factors that all 11 companies exhibited as its stock price performance went from average to outstanding.

The selected 11 companies are Abbott Laboratories, Circuit City, Fannie Mae, Gillette, Kimberly-Clark, Kroger, Nucor, Philip Morris, Pitney Bowes, Walgreen, and Wells Fargo.

On a side note, looking at the names today reveals that some of the companies lost their way significantly. Even “great” companies can fall but we all know about that.

The 5 Concepts

The 5 concepts exhibited by the researched companies are as follows.

Level 5 Leadership: Great companies have a CEO where they love what they do with determination and humility and a will to succeed. They commit to the long term vision of the company and understand the company does not revolve around them. The great companies internally promote and train great management who then continue the tradition beyond the tenure of the first “great” CEO.

First Who…Then What: People are not the most important asset of the company. The right people are and then get them in the right positions.

Control the Brutal Facts: Be brutally honest objectivley. Identify your core competencies. I’m sure Lehman and Citigroup would have benefitted from this.

Hedgehog Concept: Based upon an ancient Greek parable: “The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.”

Idenitfy your core competency, focus on it and boil it down to a single, simple and clear concept. Those companies that never made it tend to be foxes. Disorganised and diversified beyond their means.

Culture of Discipline: Disciplined thinking leads to disciplined action. One example I thought of is how as investors, we all want to see a company cut its spending on useless things such as high quality furniture and company jets. Yet, how many people would wish that happens to their own company?

How many companies are like Google, where mostly every employee from the top all the way to the bottom love their job and what the company stands for and goes all out to acheive that purpose?

Summary

Good to Great is a well structured book that describes the 5 concepts mentioned above and looks at how each of the good to great companies portrayed such characteristics. The content is interesting not just because of the 5 concepts but the history and stories of the companies themselves provides an interesting read. People with an MBA probably would’nt find anything new, but aspiring businessmen and leaders as well as investors would do well to read it.

My Argument For Liking and Recommending the Book

As with all books there are pros and cons, but it seems this is one of those books subject to analysis and additional research and “tests” by third parties trying to disprove the thesis of the book. I assume it’s because of the popularity of the book (#48 rank in Amazon) and because it is a required text in many business schools.

The main gripe that people have with the book is that the 5 key points the author highlights is far too generic to prove anything true. It is true that many companies applied or have tried to apply the same principles and ideas yet still failed, however, I don’t agree with this argument, simply because I never believe that a book will be able to provide a complete and true step by step guide. That’s what procedures and manuals are for.

It is also true that the qualities of successful companies are so diverse that it would be impossible to write about and satisfy anyone in 200-300 pages without being quite broad and generic. My argument to this is to relate it to great people from history. Great people are also diverse in so many ways. If you had to categorise a great person, it would be be impossible. Great people consisted of missionaries, soldiers, artists, religious leaders, inventors, scientists etc all with varying degrees of kindness, humility, bravery, publicity, intellect, skills and eloquence. I could populate a list of names from history and try to come up with a theory of why such people were considered great, but that would also require me to be “broad”.

On the other hand, if you look at the people that brought disaster to countries and companies, they are always too similar. Pride, greed, selfishness and power are all qualities exhibited by such people. The same can be said for companies such as Enron, Worldcom, Tyco and now Bear Stearns, Lehman and Wamu.

Given the complexity of the task, Collins has done an excellent job.

[tags]investment book, level 5 leadership, abbott laboratories, circuit city, fannie mae, walgreen, jim collins, wells fargo, nucor, pitney bowes, philip morris, kroger [/tags]

You Can Be A Stock Market Genius!

(This article first appeared on The DIV-Net)

You can be a stock market genius! No this isn’t a review of one of those Dummy series books on getting rich. The book is in fact written by Joel Greenblatt, the author of everybody’s favourite, The Little Book That Beats The Market. With the markets in turmoil, I’m sure there are so many good opportunities out there and many investors are probably busy going through all the financial statements of potential buy candidates for their portfolio. But what about special situations?

Buying great companies selling for less than their intrinsic value is a great idea and one which value investing is based upon. However, do remember there are many different ways of profiting in the market via the low risk, high return method that is also a cornerstone of value investing. This is where Greenblatt’s book comes in.

Note: The book is more suited for DIY folks who have a good handle on investing and able to navigate through financial statements and reports.

Investing in Unknown Areas

You’ve heard it many times. “You have to know something others don’t in order to make a profit”. This book opens your eyes to the other tremendous opportunities of the market.

How many people are worried about the financial markets, the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, the intention to spin off divisions or sell divisions to raise capital by AIG and other major financial companies? By all means, it’s perfectly fine to be scared but did you know that you can profit from all this with diligence and low risk.

Just 1 month ago, reading today’s headlines would have shaken me up but after reading the book, I am now eager and excited to see how things shape up so that I can profit from situations when people are running scared. The many detailed past examples and analyses by Greenblatt helps to provide a clearer understanding and picture of how to go about doing it yourself.

By understanding different scenarios and being able to keep up to date with a situation, an individual can not only gain an edge over the troubled big boys but also to make impressive gains from a low risk methodology.

The book takes us through each different situation, or what we call special situation, and consist of the following:

  • Spin-offs
  • Mergers/Risk Arbitrage (book advises against risk arbitrage)
  • Merger Securities
  • Bankruptcies (not investing IN bankrupt companies but rather in what results from it)
  • Restructurings
  • Rights Offerings
  • Recapitalizations

Investing Independent of the Market

I have found a pull towards special situation investing for a few reasons

  1. Investing a portion of your portfolio in special situations will definitely stop or slow the slide from a falling market.
  2. Special situations occur independent of the market. Opportunities arise in down markets (spin offs, bankruptcies, restructurings) as well as good markets (mergers, recaps).
  3. Not all that different from ordinary stock analysis but in some cases, such as mergers, you only need to focus on the process of the merger rather than deal with the growth, discount rates and other hard variables.
  4. Money isn’t always tied up for long periods at a time.

Risks

I’ve emphasised many times that if you don’t understand how to calculate and handle risk (the probability of losing everything), it would be much safer to go long on good companies. The book also mentions several times that if the investor is prepared to do the additional work, pick their own spots and battles, rather than invest mechanically or blindly based on the recommendations of others, the individual should do very well.

General Comments

Like all books, it provides a skeleton with some bits and pieces included to help you on the way, but it’s up to the individual to fill up that skeleton and thrive in the satisfaction of seeing it come alive.

I now view headlines and “bad” news differently. I am beginning to see pieces of information between the headlines.

The book is well formatted and easy to read with some quirky humour thrown in. I started reading and was up to page 50 before I knew it.

The content of the book is something you can’t and will not learn in business or finance school.

“There are three types of people in the world–those who can count, and those who can’t.”

[tags]spin off, special situation, arbitrage, bankruptcy, leaps[/tags]