Archive for the ‘Special_Situation’ Category

Learn how to invest, read stock analysis, and find stock picks

Arbitrage: Emageon (EMAG)

For those that have noticed my Twitter updates, a merger that I have been looking into is Emageon (EMAG).  The spread at the closing date of Jan 16,2009 was 47% with a closing deadline of Feb 11, 2009. This leaves us 3 weeks to work with if the deal is sealed in time.

Basics Of The Merger

  • Deal first announced on Oct 13, 2008 and worth $62m
  • If the deal goes through, each share of EMAG will be converted to $2.85 cash
  • Shareholder approval obtained and no other approvals required
  • Financing is being handled by Stanford International Bank Limited(SIBL)
  • Financing was cancelled at first on Dec 23 followed by a decision to continue.
  • All debt buyout by Health Systems Solutions (HSS)
  • SIBL holds over 20% ownership of HSS

Termination Details

The merger is at a stage where it is too late for the buyer to try and terminate the deal, however, the deal is not bound by any harsh conditions. The merger can be cancelled quite easily with neither party having to pay a termination fee on a mutual written consent. There are some conditions where EMAG will have to pay $3m if HSS cancels due to EMAG breaching the following rules:

  • our Board withdraws, modifies or qualifies, or publicly proposes to withdraw, modify or qualify, in a manner adverse to HSS and Merger Sub, our Board’s recommendation to our stockholders that they adopt the merger agreement;
  • our Board approves, recommends or endorses, or proposes publicly to recommend or endorse, any takeover proposal other than the merger;
  • our Board enters into any letter of intent or similar document or any contract accepting any takeover proposal;
  • we fail to include in this proxy statement the recommendation of our Board of Directors that our stockholders vote “FOR” adoption of the merger agreement; or
  • we intentionally and knowingly materially breach any of our non-solicitation and related obligations with respect to acquisition proposals;

These are basic merger agreements so we don’t have to worry about EMAG having to pay $3m for breaking these conditions.

After the merger announcement on Oct 21, 2008, HSS deposited $5m into Escrow and recently deposited another $4m after SIBL came back right after refusing to finance the deal. If the deal is now not completed by the new extended date of Feb 21, 2009, EMGA is entitled to receive the $9m in the Escrow account.

Approvals

Under the merger agreement, we agreed with HSS to make, if applicable, all appropriate filings with the United States Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice, under the HSR Act, and all appropriate filings under foreign competition or merger control laws. However, other than the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in order to effect the merger, we do not believe that any regulatory filings or applications, including under the HSR Act, are required to be made in respect of the consummation of the merger

Nothing to worry about on the approval side. Shareholders have approved the deal so there are no further regulations holding the deal back.

Risks

The important thing to note is that a 50% spread does not refer to the chance of a deal being abandoned. Let me digress for a moment.

The spread points more towards the number of scared and uncertain people. E.g. on Thursday Jan 15, 2009, PSD, which I’ve covered numerous times, fell to $26.50 the day before the closing date announcement. PSD jumped to $29.60 the following day. Mergers are driven more by fear and uncertainty than evidence. Did you know that too many Wall Street and big players do not read the SEC filings? So how does the market know everything? It doesn’t. Now back to the topic.

The biggest risk to this deal is whether financing will hold but there are signs that it will. After the shocking news that SIBL decided to refuse financing, the press release from both parties expressed that they are still determined to go through with the deal and seeking other options if necessary. Shortly after HSS deposited another $4m into the Escrow account. Seeing as how HSS is funding 100% of the deal through debt to SIBL, HSS must have sold more convertible debentures to SIBL. In other words, SIBL financed a further $4m right after a refusal to finance.

This brings me to some questioning points;

  1. SIBL is completely crazy to finance another $4m (total $9m) if they don’t plan on going ahead with the merger
  2. It was an act of faith by SIBL and HSS to ensure the markets that they are committed
  3. The only reason SIBL made that annoucement in Dec was to try and extend the merger date to make certain they could meet the deadline or
  4. SIBL had tax, year end or quarterly numbers they had to meet and made up a bogus annoucement

However, the December report from SIBL (pdf link), reaffirms its investors that “although our earnings will not meet expectations in 2008, Stanford International Bank Ltd. is strong, safe and fiscally sound.”

I’ll leave it up to you to come up with your own conclusion, but I am leaning towards 3 and 4.

Also, we have to consider whether EMAG is the type of company that is worth holding if the deal fails. PSD was an easy one because it had a long history, electricity is a necessity and they also offer a nice dividend. EMAG has none of these qualities. Considering their short history, high cash burn rate and regular dilution of shares, EMAG is not a company I would like to hold in any normal situation other than a buyout.

Completion Checklist

  1. Due diligence by both parties – Yes. Both have clearly stated so.
  2. Financing and regulator approval – Yes. SIBL has recommitted and further financed an additional $4m
  3. Get preliminary shareholder sentiment (or controlling shareholder approval) – N/A
  4. Obtain regulator (SEC, FCC, any and all) approval – N/A
  5. Get final shareholder approval at a meeting called for that purpose – Yes
  6. Insiders continually vesting or buying shares – No. Accipiter Capital Management is the only big buyer in Dec. Insiders have not been buying but they have not been selling or exercising their options.

Odds of the Merger

Current Price: $1.94

Upside Potential: 47% / $2.85

Downside Potential: 47% / $1.02

Probability of Success: conservative: >60% | realistic: > 75%

Probability of Failure: conservative: < 40% | realistic: > 25%

Time Frame: min: 3 weeks | max: 11 weeks (3 months) until March 31,2009.

Additional Remarks

The interesting thing with this deal is that EMAG has $19.5m in cash, will receive $9m if the merger fails for a total of $28.5m which equates to $1.33 of cash per share. If the deal fails and EMAG falls to $1 again, we are entering another type of special situation where the company will be trading for less than its cash value.

With a potential $1.33 of cash per share, is EMAG worth $0.61 if we are to buy at the current price of $1.94? As I stated above in the risks, I am not sure how much the company is worth.

The odds are very enticing, but my failure probabilities and the quality of the company makes it difficult to make it a big position if I do decide to buy.

Disclosure

No positions at time of writing.

[tags] arbitrage,Special Situation,merger,emag,hss[/tags]

—————————————————————————-
Cisco ccie is the most valuable certification exam of Cisco. The other value added Cisco certification exams are Cisco Certified Network Associate ccna and Cisco Certified Network Professional ccnp. The first certification exam that will build your career is a comptia a+. After you have got comptia a+ certification, you should move towards mcsa certification and itil certification.
—————————————————————————-

List of Merger Arbitrages for 2009

Be Highly Selective With Merger Arbitrage

My assumption is that successful merger arbitrages will be hard to come by in 2009. Quite simply because banks are unwilling to finance deals, companies are less willing to use their own cash and takeover prices will be reassessed and most obviously, there is too much uncertainty..

Take a look at PSD and the 10% spread remaining. The risk of the deal failing is minuscule. Odds of 9-1 in my favor, yet the market is scared of something.

So this IS the good news. These conditions have widened the spreads of arbitrages starting September of 2008. Since I visit a list of pending mergers in the US regularly, I’ve definitely noticed the list getting shorter.

The following is a list of pending mergers as of Jan 8, 2009 courtesy of Merger Investing.

Symbol Announced Date Closing Value Last Price Closing Date Profit Annualized Profit
ZICA 8/14/2008 $0.40 $0.46 Unknown -13.04% 0.00%
DNA 7/21/2008 $89.00 $84.40 Unknown 5.45% 0.00%
FONR 11/14/2008 $5.00 $0.94 Unknown 431.91% 0.00%
NRG 10/19/2008 $26.43 $24.11 Unknown 9.62% 0.00%
MVG 12/2/2008 $4.54 $5.15 Unknown -11.84% 0.00%
NTMD 12/4/2008 $0.50 $0.40 Unknown 25.00% 0.00%
TLGD 11/18/2008 $5.50 $5.18 Unknown 6.18% 0.00%
COWN 12/8/2008 $7.00 $6.47 Unknown 8.19% 0.00%
CRXL 1/7/2009 $20.55 $23.00 Unknown -10.65% 0.00%
MVCO 7/28/2008 $11.25 $7.74 1/7/2009 45.35% 0.00%
PSD 10/26/2007 $30.00 $27.40 1/31/2009 9.49% 150.59%
ROH 7/10/2008 $78.00 $60.00 1/31/2009 30.00% 476.09%
DSCP 9/16/2008 $53.00 $52.65 1/31/2009 0.66% 10.55%
NNDS 8/14/2008 $63.00 $57.00 2/2/2009 10.53% 153.68%
EMAG 10/13/2008 $2.85 $1.96 2/11/2009 45.41% 487.47%
LNY 6/16/2008 $13.50 $12.75 3/31/2009 5.88% 26.18%
CPHL 8/5/2008 $15.64 $13.76 3/31/2009 13.65% 60.77%
ACBA 9/10/2008 $11.34 $10.21 3/31/2009 11.11% 49.47%
CVP 9/19/2008 $2.50 $2.09 3/31/2009 19.62% 87.32%
INOC 10/6/2008 $3.45 $1.99 3/31/2009 73.19% 325.80%
SOV 10/13/2008 $3.09 $3.03 3/31/2009 2.11% 9.37%
ZIGO 10/16/2008 $7.15 $7.12 3/31/2009 0.46% 2.05%
FRBK 11/10/2008 $9.26 $8.69 3/31/2009 6.51% 28.97%
TMTA 11/17/2008 $18.70 $18.69 3/31/2009 0.05% 0.24%
DISK 11/20/2008 $2.75 $1.80 3/31/2009 52.78% 234.93%
MNT 12/1/2008 $31.00 $30.95 3/31/2009 0.16% 0.72%
WVCM 12/2/2008 $11.53 $11.17 3/31/2009 3.22% 14.35%
ANL 12/10/2008 $14.20 $13.84 3/31/2009 2.60% 11.58%
SCOP 12/23/2008 $5.62 $5.45 3/31/2009 3.12% 13.88%
IDEV 1/5/2009 $4.50 $5.38 3/31/2009 -16.36% -72.81%
BUF 12/22/2008 $0.12 $0.11 3/31/2009 9.09% 40.47%
EQ 10/27/2008 $39.31 $37.99 6/30/2009 3.46% 7.30%
CYCL 11/7/2008 $8.50 $8.17 6/30/2009 4.04% 8.52%
ABNJ 12/15/2008 $12.02 $11.93 6/30/2009 0.76% 1.60%
PBKS 12/19/2008 $8.46 $8.29 6/30/2009 2.06% 4.35%
AANB 1/2/2009 $3.26 $3.01 6/30/2009 8.19% 17.28%
SWIM 1/8/2009 $8.67 $8.34 6/30/2009 4.00% 8.43%

The spreads have closed on many of them since 2008 but there are some where the spread seems to be due to an overreaction.

One merger I started looking into today was EMAG. There is a 45% spread and most would immediately believe the deal to fail, but some other details and the contrarian in me tells me that this is an interesting play.

ROH is another potential deal and we know that Dow Chemical wants the merger. With a 30% spread, the recent pull out by Kuwait could actually have been a good thing IF the price is not lowered.

Disclosure

I hold PSD at time of writing.

Puget Energy Merger Approved and Review

The Puget Energy merger has finally been approved on December 30, 2008. After more than 1 year since I first got wind of this deal, the entire deal is expected to close in 2 weeks for $30 cash. Surprisingly, PSD is still trading at a discount to its final closing price. It is currently at $27.50. This still leaves room for a 9% gain with all uncertainty eliminated..

In my last post on PSD, let’s take a step back and review what happened, how I went about doing things, what went right and what went wrong.

Due Diligence

Here is a list of what was involved in my due diligence of PSD. A reference for new readers and future mergers.

A. Before purchasing any shares the important thing is that the conditions and state of the merger satisfies the following checklist. Also see this post to get started if interested in mergers.

  1. Due diligence by all parties
  2. Financing and regulator approval
  3. Get preliminary shareholder sentiment (or controlling shareholder approval)
  4. Obtain regulator (SEC, FCC, any and all) approval
  5. Get final shareholder approval at a meeting called for that purpose
  6. Insiders continually vesting or buying shares

B. Throughout the past 3 months of following the deal closely, I have been keeping up to date with all filings submitted by PSD to the SEC via RSS.

C. Read each annual report and quarterly report since the merger announcement to see whether there were any changes in the verbiage. Also read the proxy and other documents to understand the structure of the deal. This was a cash deal so it was straightforward.

D. I also spoke directly with investor relations of PSD and got the impression that she was not worried about the deal at all.

E. Documented my reasoning and thoughts so that I had something to refer back to and remind myself if the price went down and I started getting emotional.

F. Went to the Washington UTC website and quickly browsed and read the concluding statements of the filing documents of involved parties. This part was what helped me drown out noise, stay focused and to draw up conclusions and scenarios.

G. Assign odds to the merger. If you don’t know what the odds of winning are, don’t even consider playing.

What Went Right

I must say that I was lucky with this deal. Lucky because utility merger approvals are very unpredictable with lots of opposition, lucky because Washington State has a history or killing deals at the last minute, lucky because the markets ignored the facts and depressed the prices heavily in our favor.

It was also a good thing that this deal was in my backyard and I had knowledge of the geography and makeup of the state and its affairs. Had PSD been in another state, my level of uncertainty would have been much higher. So if a merger is announced in your home state, always be sure to keep your eye on it. This is where you have home court advantage and something Wall Street will never know.

Wall Street not knowing = fear and uncertainty in the markets = good chance to pick up deals.

Add to that the buyer being an Australian company I was familiar with and it made the perfect arbitrage for me in 2008.

What Went Wrong

I had originally assumed the merger would take a week or so to close but I was completely off on this part. It ended up being 2 1/2 months. Although the upside gain more than compensated for the time, the period in which cash was held up was far too long and led me to miss out on better buying opportunities of SCHN (up 100%) and HANS (up 40%) which I had on my watch list.

What I will do differently next time is to think about the min and max time frame for completion just as we think about the min and max value of a company.

Asset Allocation

Back in September I had bought shares and just after the crash I sold it all while still ahead because I wanted to buy something else that got hammered.

Eventually the price went lower to its pre merger levels and I bought again, more this time. A couple weeks later, it went down to 10% below my purchase price on no news and I could sense people and some readers getting nervous. I doubled down at this point by selling my worst ideas. I didn’t want to make the same mistake I made with the Aquila merger by not investing enough to leave a decent profit after fees and taxes.

Puget Energy Coverage Closed at Old School Value

I am glad to say that on the last trading day of 2008, the announcement has lifted my sagging portfolio to a reasonable finish. The arbitrage helped keep my portfolio steady during the wild volatility as well as adding a nice return to my performance without having to speculate.

With 2009 expected to be worse than what we are going through now, I expect mergers to slow down further and fail more often. My decision to be involved in one merger at a time and focus on details has turned out to be safe and I will stick to this in the future.

Disclosure

I own shares of PSD at time of writing

[tags]PSD, special situation, mergers, arbitrage[/tags]

Puget Energy Merger Delayed

It has been announced that the PSD merger will not close by the end of the year. The merger agreement requires closing the deal 15 business days after all requirements have been met, including approval by the Utilities and Transportation Commission. Today being the 12th and not expecting an announcement this week, we run out of days in December for it to work out.

A New Question Regarding The Merger

On hearing the news, a slight concern related to financing came to my mind. What happens to the capital if the financing condition is based on a closure date of 2008. Would the money still be available in 2009?

After reviewing the Proxy statement, it does not reveal anything related to deadlines or timeframes for financing. I’ll consider this as the capital still being available in 2009.

Scanning through the proxy also served as a reminder to check on the banks (Barclays and Dresdner) providing the debt financing. (No comments on this yet.)

Going deeper into search led me to think about the ownership and how the Macquarie people were involved.

Ownership Interest

The latest 13D statement from Oct 2, 2008 shows the ownership of the Macquarie shareholders. Additionally, the notes bring up some interesting information, but first, the ownership is as follows:

  • Macquarie Infrastructure Partners A, L.P. – 1.3%
  • Macquarie Infrastructure Partners International, L.P – 1.4%
  • Macquarie Infrastructure Partners Canada, L.P. – 0.3%
  • Macquarie FSS Infrastructure Trust – 0.4%
  • Macquarie Asset Finance Limited – 1.5%

In total, Macquarie holds 4.9%. This is not a huge amount but it does show that the buyer is serious.

Regarding the notes, there is a section which states;

“On October 2, 2008, Padua MG Holdings (PMGH) transferred all of the shares of Common Stock that it held to Macquarie Asset Finance Limited (MAFL). As a result of the transfer, PMGH no longer holds any shares of Common Stock……

Macquarie Capital Group Limited (MCGL) is the operating company for Macquarie Group Limited (MGL) non-banking operations. MCGL often invests alongside Macquarie Group managed funds in investments similar to the acquisition of Puget in an underwriting capacity. This is the case for the Merger, and MCGL expects to sell down either the shares of PMGH or PMGH’s minority position to other Macquarie Group-managed funds prior to financial close of the Merger or shortly thereafter.”

It seems like the price drop starting Oct 2 may have been part of Macquarie’s process of acquiring shares from other holders. It’s also exactly at this time the market started going nuts. So all of this, being part of the process, was probably overshadowed by mad Mr Market. Talk about timing.

Odds of the Merger

Time for a numbers update. Here are the figures I am now applying considering all the information I’ve laid out here and in previous posts.

Upside Potential: 23%: $24.41 -> $30

Downside Potential: 20%: $24.41 -> $20

Probability of Success: 80% (probability decreased due to my financing worries)

Probability of Failure: 20%

Time Frame: 1 week,  >1week but <1 month,  1 month

It’s also important to note that the upside and downside percentages are inversely correlated. If the price goes up, the upside decreases and downside increases and vice versa.

Other Points

From my previous posts, it’s very clear that the Public Counsel is trying to delay the merger. As I don’t understand the way business works at the UTC I have no way of answering why they can’t just ignore the Public Counsel and get on with the job. Maybe it’s part of the Public Counsel’s job description to oppose everything. Who knows..? So from today on, I’ll probably deduct the influence the Public Counsel may have in preventing the merger.

A reader asked me what other situations I have been looking into. My arbitrage strategy is to focus on one at a time so that I have a understanding of the whole picture rather than knowing bits and pieces and filling in the blanks with my own assumptions. There is so much uncertainty to a deal that missing vital clues could be disastrous. This is a risk of why arbitrage isn’t for those that don’t have the time to try and find everything.

Disclosure

Long PSD at time of writing.

[tags]arbitrage, merger, psd, puget sound, Special Situations[/tags]

Puget Energy: Price Drop On No News

Lately the price of PSD has dropped as much as 10%. If this was a regular market, that could mean something, but we are not in a regular market – it’s still driven by fear and emotions.

The status of the merger has not changed one bit from my last post. There have been no new publicly announced press releases, but some interesting filings with the Washington Utility and Transportation Commission (WUTC) may be of interest.

Recall that I wrote about how the final reply briefs had to be submitted by October 23,2008. Well, there were plenty of submissions and responses. I’ll provide a brief look at what’s been going on.

To read all posts related to PSD, click here.

Filings On October 23, 2008

Conclusion of the reply briefs submitted by PSD

  • The members of Puget Holdings have demonstrated a long-term commitment to
    PSE and its customers.
  • Puget Holdings’ commitment to PSE goes beyond financial support.
  • Puget Holdings has worked closely with other stakeholders in this process and has earned the support of almost all parties to this proceeding.
  • Only Public Counsel fails to recognize the benefits of the Proposed Transaction.
  • The supporting parties have divergent interests and goals, yet they have acknowledged that the Proposed
    Transaction is in the public interest, and they have supported the Multiparty Settlement Stipulation.

Conclusion of the reply briefs submitted on behalf of Commission Staff from Donald T. Trotter

  • Proposed transaction meets the Commission’s “no harm” standard
  • Commission should grant the Application according to the terms and conditions int he Settlement Stipulation
  • Commission should reject Public Counsel’s opposition to the transaction

Filings On October 24, 2008

Conclusion of the reply briefs submitted by the Public Counsel

  • Requests the Commission find the proposed transaction as described in the Settlement Stipulation is not in the public interest

Filings On October 28, 2008

Conclusion of Commission Staff Motion to Strike Portions of Public Counsel Reply Brief from Donald T. Trotter

  • The Commission Staff requests that several paragraphs from the Public Counsel’s reply brief be striked out
  • Public Counsel reply brief seeks to include additional information which should not be considered as it does not comply with the proceedings

Conclusion of Puget Holdings Motion to Strike Portions of Public Counsel Reply Brief

  • Much the same as the Commission Staff’s motion to strike. The Public Counsel only seeks to delay the proceedings

Filings On October 31, 2008

Conclusion of response from Public Counsel Opposition to Motions to Strike Portions

  • Citing late-breaking news in a brief is not ordinary procedure, for good reason. This is not an ordinary situation, however, and the rules provide the Commission the discretion and flexibility to address it.
  • Joint Applicants and Staff unreasonably ask the Commission to disregard developments that have occurred since the filing of the initial briefs, as they initially sought to do with events between the hearing and the initial briefs. Their position has been that the record should remain as it was at the end of August. Public Counsel does not agree that the Commission should operate in such a vacuum.

Filings On November 5, 2008

Conclusion of Granting Motions to Strike by the Commission

  • The Commission already has reopened the record once at Public Counsel’s request to allow him to introduce materials similar for the most part to what he seeks to introduce here.
  • The material he introduced then was of marginal relevance and cumulative to evidence already in the record which illustrates that financial markets in the U.S. and worldwide currently are volatile.
  • There is nothing compelling about what Public Counsel seeks to introduce.
  • Contrary to Public Counsel’s suggestion, the Commission is not “operating in a vacuum” in this regard, but is fully aware of current events.
  • The Commission grants Staff’s and Joints Applicants’ respective motions to strike.

Filings On November 11, 2008

Denying Public Counsel’s Motion Challenging Confidentiality

This filing is in response to the Public Counsel’s challenge to the Commission that it did not abide by the confidentiality codes.

  • Considering this, and the fact that Public Counsel challenges the confidential designation of all of the information highlighted in Mr. Hill’s testimony, we find Public Counsel’s motion deficient on its face.
  • THE COMMISSION DENIES the “(Corrected) Public Counsel Motion Challenging the Confidentiality of Certain Materials Provided in Discovery by Joint Applicants.”

Conclusion

It’s evident that the Public Counsel’s purpose is to delay the merger. They have been unable to provide any real argument and all their challenges have been met with denials.

All parties affected by the merger have agreed that the merger is in the best interest of the public except the Public Counsel. Even the commission staff has expressed that the merger meets all standards and it should be approved.

The only conclusion I can come up with is that hedge funds are selling their positions as they try to deleverage. Don’t be fooled that the market is efficient in the short term.

My estimated holding period of 1 week was way off. I’ve held PSD shares for 1 month now, but considering a nice gain is still available and the stability it is providing for my portfolio, I don’t mind holding for 1 more month.

Disclosure

I hold shares of PSD at the time of this writing.

The current price looks pretty good to me but I won’t be adding as I’ve already doubled down and am pretty overweight with this one.

[tags]PSD, merger, UTC, arbitrage, Special Situations[/tags]

Capital Crossing Preferred (CCPCN) and HealthShares ETF Liquidation

I’m chartering into inexperienced waters with this topic, so I hope people will provide comments if they have experience with investing in actual liquidations. In this post, I’ll be discussing 2 liquidations. Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation (CCPCN) and HealthShares Exchange-Traded Funds.

Quick Definition

For those unfamiliar, a liquidation is a process where a company is brought to an end. It converts all of its assets into cash. That is, they sell all positions in their portfolios, sell their real estate, inventory, desks, chairs and anything else that may have cash value. Remember how the value of a company is the sum of its future cash flows as well as its shareholders equity? In a liquidation, since there is no more future cash flow, a piece of the shareholders equity is what we are entitled to received.

Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation (CCPCN) Liquidation

(Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation is an entity of Capital Crossing.)

I stumbled upon Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation (CCPCN) on the news that CCPCN (the preferred stock) is being called for a liquidation price of $25 cash on Dec 1, 2008. It’s closing price today was $23.75.

There is still a 5% spread remaining but I am not sure whether the shares will be tradeable on the actual call date. If it is, a guaranteed 5% with zero risk in 1 day would definitely be fantastic. The annualized gain would be astronomical even after fees.

From the 8-K filing on Oct 31, 2008

On October 27, 2008, the Board of Directors of Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation unanimously approved, subject to obtaining the approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision to the extent required by law or regulation or policy of the OTS, the voluntary complete liquidation and dissolution of the Corporation as being advisable and in the best interests of the Corporation’s stockholders and adopted a Plan of Complete Liquidation and Dissolution of the Corporation.

….

On or before December 1, 2008, the Corporation intends to declare one or more liquidating distributions in cash to the holders of shares of Series D Preferred Stock representing the full liquidation preference on the Series D Preferred Stock of $25.00 per share, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends thereon from the beginning of the dividend period in which the liquidation occurs to the date of liquidation.

CCPCN Liquidation Probability

I assume that even liquidations should be approached like merger arbitrage, except that the probabilities are much higher.

Mergers get cancelled for all sorts of reasons, but I’ve never heard of shareholders or external factors preventing a liquidation if the board has already approved it.

Here is an excerpt from the 10-Q filing on Nov 14,2008.

Since Capital Crossing Preferred is a subsidiary of Lehman Bank, federal bank regulatory authorities will have the right to examine it and its activities and under certain circumstances, to impose restrictions on Lehman Bank or Capital Crossing Preferred which could impact Capital Crossing Preferred’s ability to conduct its business according to its business objectives. For instance, if Lehman Bank’s regulators determine that Lehman Bank’s relationship to Capital Crossing Preferred results in an unsafe and unsound banking practice, the regulators could restrict Capital Crossing Preferred’s ability to transfer assets, to make distributions to its stockholders or even require Lehman Bank to sever its relationship with or divest its ownership interest in Capital Crossing Preferred.

In the end, it seems like the company has acknowledged it would be better off liquidating. So the chances of this going through is very high.

It’s a shame I’m potentially missing out on a nice gain with virtually no risk, but I’ll use this as a learning tool for future special situations.

You can read a news article on CCPCN here. Moving onto HealthShares.

HealthShares Exchange-Traded Funds Liquidation

It seems like ETF liquidations are less profitable as they are usually priced very close to their Net Asset Value (NAV). The only potential reward is if the ETF market price is below the funds NAV.

(Net Asset Value is the Net Assets of the Fund divided by shares outstanding)

Here’s a snippet of the news:

The Board of Directors of HealthShares™, Inc. a registered investment company, today announced that it has determined to liquidate the Company’s four underlying investment portfolios effective December 31, 2008 and subsequently dissolve the Company.

….

The Board also carefully considered current market conditions, the inability of the Funds to attract significant market interest since their inception, their future viability as well as their prospects for growth in the Funds’ assets in the foreseeable future, and thereafter determined that it was advisable and in the best interests of the Funds and their shareholders to liquidate the Funds.

ETF’s to be Liquidated

The funds that will be liquidated are as follows:

  • HealthShares™ Cancer Exchange-Traded Fund (HHK)
  • HealthShares™ European Drugs Exchange-Traded Fund (HRJ)
  • HealthShares™ Diagnostics Exchange-Traded Fund (HHD)
  • HealthShares™ Drug Discovery Tools Exchange-Traded Fund (HHV)

December 23, 2008 is the last day of trading for the shares and all trading will halt on December 24, 2008.

Return Percentage

Comparing the market price and NAV for each of the ETF’s

HHK

Market Price (11/26/2008) 23.99
NAV (11/26/2008) 24.36

HRI

Market Price (11/26/2008) 15.26
NAV (11/26/2008) 14.79

HHD

Market Price (11/26/2008) 20.31
NAV (11/26/2008) 20.53

HHV

Market Price (11/26/2008) 21.44
NAV (11/26/2008) 22.38

As you can see, HHV seems to be the only candidate with a 4.38% spread but who knows how that will change over the next 3 weeks.

Risks

An ETF liqudiation is tricky because it acts much like a stock, except it holds other disadvantages.

  1. When the managers liquidate the portfolios, expenses go up
  2. Capital gains taxes that needs to be paid
  3. Unlike regular risk arbitrage, I can’t think of a way to hedge

Conclusion

Company liquidations can be very profitable if you are aware of the news.

ETF liquidations are barely worth the effort unless there is a difference between market price and NAV close to the end of trading deadline.

Disclosure

No positions in any stocks mentioned at time of writing

[tags]CCPCN, heatlhshares, etf, liquidation, special situation[/tags]