Value Investing Forum

Discuss value investing stock ideas

You must be logged in to post
Search Forums:


 






Wildcard Usage:
*    matches any number of characters
%    matches exactly one character

American Biltrite (ABL) — Highly Undervalued?

UserPost

9:33 am
August 22, 2011


Jae Jun

Admin

posts 1453

3

Thanks for bringing up this topic.

Here are my comments based on your valuation numbers.

  • Net Reproduction Value  = $33.04.
  • EPV Valuation = $17.09
  • DCF Valuation = $12.71

EPV is lower than NPV which means that the company has no moat. This is because it costs far more to reproduce the assets than what the assets produce in earnings.

DCF seems to confirm this hunch as the future cash flow doesn't seem to be that high.

Not sure whether using a WACC of 6% for EPV and 20% for DCF is an ideal combination. The discount rate difference is much too high. For EPV I prefer to stick to a minium of 9%. After all, even for a no growth business, I would still like to receive 9% or better off the investment.

 

 

1:31 am
August 22, 2011


Graeme

Austin, Texas

Member

posts 180

2

Definitely looks cheap; I generally like things that are trading at 50% of their book value. Looks like the biggest thing that is deflating their price is all of those pesky asbestos lawsuits. My guess is the question you need to find the answer to is whether the worst is behind them, or if it is cheap enough for you to buy and ride out the rest of the lawsuits. It would be also good to find out if these asbestos lawsuits were from way back when and they have since reformed, or if they are still using it in their business. 

 

FWIW, the chairman of ABL did have this to say recently: "Unfortunately, the positive benefit of this sales performance was mitigated by significant raw material cost increases. These divisions are attempting to recover some of these additional costs through price increases. However, further inflationary pressures are continuing during the second quarter of 2011." (source) That being said, I don't think raw mat costs increases are what is keeping it around half-book. 

2:04 pm
August 21, 2011


AVIC

Member

posts 5

1

Hello All,

 

I've been taking a look at American Biltrite and believe it's highly undervalued but wanted to throw it out there for a brief sanity check.

 

The company has three divisions:  ABI Speciality Tapes, American Biltrite Canada (flooring, conveyor belts, sheet rubber packing, matting, truck flaps, etc.), and K&M Associates, a national costume jewelry supplier.

 

Market Cap is $20.8 million, and TTM revenues are around 210 million, with gross profit margins of ~50%.

 

My valuation calculations show:

 

Net Reproduction Value  = $33.04.

EPV Valuation = $17.09

DCF Valuation = $12.71

Avg. valuation target = $20.95.

 

For the EPV calculation, I wanted to be conservative so I used the average Owner's Earnings of from 2001 to 2010 which was $8.4 million.  For the discount rate I used the company's weighted average cost of capital, which is 6%.  This resulted in a valuation target of $17.09.

 

For the DCF calculation, I used a 20% discount rate and assumed 0% terminal growth and projected future cash flows for each year equal to the average owner's earnings from 2001 to 2010 ($8.4 million).

 

Working against the company are a large number of asbestos litigation court cases due to the fact that ABL used to manufacture flooring products containing asbestos.  From the company's 2011 Q2 10-Q:  

 

"ABI has multiple excess layers of insurance coverage for asbestos claims. The total indemnity costs incurred to settle claims during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 were $3.2 million and $5.7 million, respectively, all of which were paid by ABI's first-layer excess umbrella insurance carriers, as were the related defense costs.  ABI has multiple excess layers of insurance coverage for asbestos claims. The total indemnity costs incurred to settle claims during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 were $3.2 million and $5.7million, respectively, all of which were paid by ABI's first-layer excess umbrella insurance carriers, as were the related defense costs."

 

Total number of Asbestos related claims filed against ABL in 2010 were 304, while for the six months ending June 30, 2011, there were 190 new claims–an annual rate of 380.  The company currently has almost 1300 unsettled claims against it, although it looks as though it's only settling 14% of these cases.  The rest are getting dismissed.   The company's lower and upper estimates for the total amount it will have to settle are about $17 million on the low end and $61 million on the high end.

 

On the other hand a quick look at the company's balance sheet shows that it seems to have significantly reduced its liabilities over the last few years.

 

Has anyone else looked at ABL?  Are there any booby-traps here I'm missing?

 

Thanks,

Larry D.

AVIC

 

 

 



About the Stock Valuation Software forum

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 170

Currently Online: matias091
19 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 40
Topics: 762
Posts: 4095

Membership:

There are 955 Members
There have been 9 Guests

There is 1 Admin
There are 3 Moderators

Top Posters:

somrh – 336
Graeme – 180
nell – 100
zehua – 96
valueinvestortoday – 80
krackerjack121 – 69

Recent New Members: matias091, foundos, pberardi, JohnnyB, Style, BOBODDY

Administrators: Jae Jun (1453 Posts)

Moderators: Jae Jun (1453 Posts), VANYA (1 Post), djsun (0 Posts)