Value Investing Forum

Discuss value investing stock ideas

You must be logged in to post
Search Forums:


 






Wildcard Usage:
*    matches any number of characters
%    matches exactly one character

MOD-PAC (MPAC) – Typical scenario of ineffective management

UserPost

5:44 pm
January 11, 2012


Jae Jun

Admin

posts 1453

1

MOD-PAC is a high value-added, on-demand print services firm that is focused on the design and manufacture of folding cartons.  It also has a personalized print product line.

The term folding cartons is the box packaging you see in cereals and box packaging with designs on it. Serves all sorts of products. Mainly for retail sales. Personalized print is customized printing for such things as letterheads, business cards, posters, invitations, cards etc.

Why is it Cheap? / Is it Cheap?

  • Very small company
  • Operates in a very competitive industry
  • Competition consists of both large corporations to small independent companies
  • Exited commercial print business in 2009 as revenue deterioted after losing vistraprint in 2004. The impairment caused a drop in earnings.
  • Was spun off from Astronics in 2003. A totally unrelated parent.

Management

  • Daniel Keane is CEO. Kevin Keane is chairman of board. Must be father and son combo. Not an independent board at all.
  • Strong insider ownership. Inside executives and directors own 33.5% of class A stock.
  • Daniel Keane and Kevin Keane own 48% of class B stock.
  • Total executive compensation in 2010 made up 3% of revenue in 2010. Not something that I like. 3% is borderline, which really means it is too high.
  • Not much insider buying except in Oct 2011 where a few insiders bought in the open market. Majority of insider activies is stock option acquisitons.
  • The company has never really outperformed its peers, but bonuses are always given.
  • CEO get his "club fees" of $13,858 paid by the company, personal finance planning fees paid, tax return preparation expenses paid. COO gets similiar benefits. Why isn't the CEO and COO paying for this themselves? It has nothing to do with the company.
  • From what I can tell, management is looking out for their own interests first.

Growth

  • Not much growth that MPAC can achieve. It is operating in a niche where it has basically filled the position that it is in. Only way to grow is to acquire other companies, but current financials do not support this.
  • MPAC isn't big enough to get national customers. Has to work within regions where they are located.
  • Personalized print business is not a good business model. Even more competition.

Strategic Advantage/Moat

  • No moat.
  • MPAC does have a strategic advantage in that it is more nimble and efficient that bigger competitors, but also can handle more capacity than the small companies which help to keep their prices low.
  • Their main advantage that comes up often in the annual report is that "MOD-PAC’s focus is on niche market opportunities requiring short print runs, which capitalize on our efficient processes and operations to meet customers’ highly variable needs." – In other words, short run printing.
  • Short cycle time means they don't have to lock in futures contracts to purchase raw materials. They also don't need to hold much inventory.

Competitors

  • Highly fragmented and competitive industry.
  • Unable to compete with bigger players.
  • Bigger competition also have integrated paper business which makes them efficient and cost effective in long run printing.
  • Competes with many other smaller mom and pop companies.

Risks

  • Customer concentration. About 30% of sales come from two customers.
  • Intense competition
  • Needs to regularly upgrade equipment to maintain edge over smaller shops as well as keep pace to some degree with bigger competitors.
  • Company will remain in stalemate mode and where shareholders will lose out.

Valuation

  • Off balance sheet liabilities consists of leases.
  • Revenue has remained flat for 5 years. TTM is better due to additional revenue from folding cartons business.
  • Margins have declined for years and only now seeing some slight improvements.
  • Shareholders equity has also been flat. No shareholder value growth.
  • FCF hovers slightly above or below the zero line.
  • Average ROE over 10 years is 3.8%
  • Average ROA over 10 years is 1.9%
  • Average CROIC over 10 years is 2%
  • Inventory age increasing. In 2007, it was 31 days. In 2010 it is now 47 days.

Catalysts

  • MPAC could be the one to get bought out.
  • Signs a new big contract that diversifys customers away from the current two. No such news of anything like this though.
  • Management's plan to increase growth in folding carton business succeeds.
  • Company buys back shares

Conclusion

Was interested in the business after reading that it was spinoff but from the looks of the company, the parent was the one with hidden value. Operates as a niche player in a competitive industry with ineffective management. Company is not positioned to grow and does not have the firepower needed to generate growth.

Easy one to throw in the pass pile.

Verdict

  • Management: C
  • Growth: C
  • Moat: C
  • Risk: B
  • Valuation: C
  • Overall: C

Other Links

None


1:14 am
February 3, 2012


Jae Jun

Admin

posts 1453

3

Thanks for the additional input and information that I missed.

However, of the five ratings, even if valuation is more attractive that what I'm seeing, the overall rating is still subpar by my standards. Definitely a good candidate for a buy out if it wasn't for the dual share structure.

5:35 am
February 2, 2012


tomfoolery

New Member

posts 1

2

I read your post on MpAc and agreed with much of it.  However, I think you're missing a couple of things here. I visited with management and toured the factory earlier this year and think that the stock offers meaningful downside protection via liquidation value, upside from continued operational recovery, and returning capital to shareholders.  Management is entrenched, but I wouldn't call them ineffective.  Were it not for the family control, PE would have taken this stock private two years ago for a pittance. 

 

 

#1 Vistaprint pulled its business from MPAC in '05-07, leaving the company with some 30% excess capacity. (Vistaprint is run by the CEOs brother who wanted to vertically integrate to improve margins). The underperformance of MPAC is a direct result of the loss of this one major customer. Covidien is approximately 1/2 the size of VIsta, and highly unlikely to vertically integrate.  The company reduced heads, increased sales efforts and has regained capacity utilization in a very tough economic environment.  I thought the CFO in particular seemed like a serious bottom line executor.  I believe that there is still significant operating leverage and margin improvement ahead. 

 

#2 the company trades at a 15-20% discount to book value. Approximately half the book value is current assets net of all liabilities.  PP&E is massively understated, four printing presses it owns are worth $10-12 million at replacement collectively. The rest of the PP&E is effectively free.  The company's accruals don't look great, but this is a result of a strategic decision to build feedstock inventory ahead of announced price increases. (Margins should at least temporarily benefit in 4Q-2Q as this is worked down.)

 

#3 The company is buying back stock, $1 million through 3Q, 200k shares remain authorized. There is potential to initiate a dividend, the company could easily support a 3% yield at current prices. My view is that such an action would be a significant catalyst because it would signal to investors that mgmt believes its current cash flow is sustainable indefinitely. 



About the Stock Valuation Software forum

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 170

Currently Online:
20 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 40
Topics: 763
Posts: 4096

Membership:

There are 956 Members
There have been 9 Guests

There is 1 Admin
There are 3 Moderators

Top Posters:

somrh – 336
Graeme – 180
nell – 100
zehua – 96
valueinvestortoday – 80
krackerjack121 – 69

Recent New Members: jman, matias091, foundos, pberardi, JohnnyB, Style

Administrators: Jae Jun (1453 Posts)

Moderators: Jae Jun (1453 Posts), VANYA (1 Post), djsun (0 Posts)