Posts Tagged ‘arbitrage’

Learn how to invest, read stock analysis, and find stock picks

Watch Alert: Puget Energy Arbitrage

I have to admit, lately the content of the blog has been evolving to special situations. I’m not sure whether the readers are ok with this, but if not, please let me know. But I digress…

In the meantime, a merger that I have had my eyes on since announcement is Puget Energy. Puget Energy is a holding company but performs all of its operations through Puget Sound Energy which is based here in Seattle, right in my backyard.

As with most utility companies in a merger or privatization deal, the deal is nearing its 1 year announcement of October 26, which is something I look for because news from 1 year ago on Wall Street is history. As with the merger of Aquila, there are many approvals to be acquired but so far things have been progressing nicely.

I bring this up today because along with the panic that set in today with the financial markets melting down, PSD was also included in the sell off.

If the deal is finalized, PSD is to be converted to $30 in cash. It was trading in the $24’s at one point this morning and closed at $27.60 on Friday. The 8% drop just goes to show that the market is full of emotion. Who said markets were efficient? :)

I won’t be going over the details here as I want to get back to looking at the deal again and other potential bargains due to todays drop.

In the meantime, here is an interesting interview by Steve Reynolds, chairman, president and CEO of PSD to add to your research.

Disclosure

I own shares of PSD

[tags]arbitrage, merger, psd, special situation[/tags]

Jazz Technologies Merger Arbitrage

(This article originally appeared on The DIV-Net)

Jazz Technologies (JAZ) announced on May 19, 2008 that they are being acquired by Tower Semiconductor (TSEM). The final decision of the deal is expected to be announced dependent on the results of the special meeting of shareholders scheduled for September 17, 2008. When I started to look into this merger yesterday, the spread was at 15%. Today, August 13, the spread fluctuates between 6-9%. However, this still comes out to an annualized gain in the range of 40-72%.

Basics Of The Merger

  • If the deal goes through, each share of JAZ will be converted to 1.8 shares of TSEM.
  • Fractional shares will be paid in cash
  • JAZ options, vested or unvested, will be exercisable for 1.8x Tower ordinary shares.
  • All approvals received and the only hurdle left is shareholder approval by Jazz shareholders.
  • For more background on the merger and both companies, you can view a presentation by going here.

Termination Details

The termination conditions for this merger allow both parties to walk away fairly easily without much pain. The usual clauses pertaining to delays, failure to recommend the merger, failure to meet legal requirements etc are in there for good measure but the point that caught my attention is that the “Jazz has agreed to pay Tower a termination fee of $1.2 million and reimburse Tower for up to $1 million in expenses incurred in connection with the transaction…”

With this type of exit path, Jazz probably wouldn’t feel any burden or impact if it did decide to cancel the merger. However, the chances of this happening at this stage is very low.

Ever since Jazz went public with an IPO price of $6, their stock price has been falling. Therefore a 120% premium offer at the time of the merger is a definite welcome, one which the company and shareholders would gladly accept.

The merger also restricts Jazz from soliciting other transactions which means that it has to be Tower. Take it or leave it.

Approvals

The acquiring company, Tower Semiconductors, is an Israeli company and so the approval process is slightly different.

Tower’s submission of form F-4 has been declared effective by the SEC, clearing the way for Jazz shareholder approval. Tower does not require approval by its own shareholders.

Additionally, Tower must receive the following approvals in Israel.

  1. approval of the Office of the Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor; (received June 3)
  2. approval of the Israeli Investment Center of the Israeli Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor; (submitted)
  3. approval of the Israel Lands Administration; and
  4. approval of the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange (listing of additional shares) (to be submitted at or around date of closing)

As it stands, all important milestones have been achieved in the merger process except the Jazz shareholder approval but this doesn’t really worry me because as I stated above, it would be crazy for shareholders to go against the merger.

While insiders also own roughly 20% of common stock, there are two companies that own about 31% and 29%. I can’t say for sure that it will be a unanimous vote, but insiders holding 20% is a large amount and one which could positively affect the outcome.

Completion Details

Since each share of Jazz is converted to 1.8 shares of Tower, the final closing price depends on Tower’s share price. Looking at Tower’s price, it isn’t doing very well either and is continually falling. There is a high likelihood that it could erode the spread completely.

So far this is how I see the merger. I also outlined a process I learnt and follow here.

  1. Due diligence by both parties – Yes
  2. Financing and regulator approval – Yes. No financing involved since shares are converted to 1.8x Towers. However, Tower is currently in “negotiation of a restructuring arrangement of its long-term debt with its lender banks, Bank Leumi and Bank Hapoalim, and one of its major shareholders, Israel Corporation Ltd. The restructuring will include a substantial reduction in the level of the Company’s debt to its banks and Israel Corporation, deferrals of remaining principal and interest, and a waiver from compliance with financial covenants for an extended period of time.” – D&R News
  3. Get preliminary shareholder sentiment (or controlling shareholder approval) – N/A
  4. Obtain regulator (SEC, FCC, any and all) approval – Yes
  5. Get final shareholder approval at a meeting called for that purpose – TBD

Risks

The risks I see are as follows:

  • Tower shares are thinly traded so even if the merger is successful, it may be difficult to sell.
  • If Tower share price continues to fall, a loss could be incurred
  • Tower is not a company I want to hold onto. No moat company in a bad industry.
  • Merger could be canceled. (low chance)
  • May not pass shareholders

Conclusion

From the information I have gathered, the merger is likely to go through. However, what is important is the price of Tower on the date of closing. If it declines at its current rate, this merger may not be worth it if the entry price is any higher than what it is now.

The merger is very low profile without much information being given out by either party. Jazz made it clear in their latest conference call that they would not answer any detailed questions related to the merger itself.

In terms of probability, I see the merger has a greater probability of closing than failing.

Disclaimer

No positions in JAZ at this time but I am considering.

[tags]arbitrage, jaz, merger, tsem, special situation[/tags]

New Merger Arbitrage With JAZ

For those that are not readers of The DIV-Net, I just wanted to let you know that I’ve written a post on another potential merger arbitrage play. With the closing date expected to be Sept 17, those that are interested could start looking into it.

As of Aug 15, there is currently a 8.95% spread which is annualized to 72.57% but be sure to weigh up the probabilities before making any decision.

Check out the post at DIV-Net.

Disclosure

No position held

[tags]merger, arbitrage, special situation[/tags]

Aquila and Great Plains Merger Review

The merger between Aquila and Great Plains has finally been approved. The deal was first announced in February of 2007 and the deal is now expected to close on July 14. It was a long process but certainly worth the investment.

Longer Than 1 Year

I first came across the deal while going through my routinely check on pending mergers from Merger Investing and I started to get interested after going through some initial filings and reports.

In the first post I went through the merger details and why I thought the merger had a lot of potential to close. At that time there was a spread of about 21% which was annualized to 178%.

The main reason I came to for such a large spread after going through the filings, reports and listening to the conference calls was mainly due to uncertainty related to the length of the merger and final regulatory approvals.

The Extended Merger

In the second post, I provided an update when the spread had closed to 7% and was contemplating what action to take. Do I sell or hold a little longer? Eventually I sold.

With a gain of 7% remaining and the market looking bleak, many other opportunies came up. Based on my selling principles, I chose to take advantage of one of the opportunities.

Points for Future Merger Workouts

The following reasons prompted me to invest in Aquila;

  • The spread was large enough given the time frame to provide a good return on investment
  • The deal was between 2 companies with great synergies
  • Merger termination conditions didn’t benefit either party
  • The merger was announced over 1 year ago and was still pending
  • Both parties displayed they sincerely wanted the merger to materialise (due diligence from both)
  • Nearly all required approvals approved

With my Aquila RSS set up, I monitored all new filings and news reports and as time progressed and insiders started to buy and vest their options, it became clear that the Missouri Commision was the only and final hurdle.

This was the type of investment where the odds of winning were 90% and losing 10%.

Lesson Learnt

A mistake I made was my asset allocation. I ended up investing with too small an amount of cash. With having to pay fairly high brokerage costs for each transaction, and not being able to deposit money into my account (drawbacks of investing with 401k account only) a few percentage points of gains were eroded.

Theoretically the plan was good but my execution wasn’t up to it.

Additionally, with mergers it’s important to differentiate between news and noise. With information on the merger being scarce, there were plenty of noisy media that had to be filtered and ignored.

Luckily, this merger went through but it could have gone the other way.

Update on Aquila (ILA) Workout

Back in March, I wrote an analysis of the Aquila (ILA) & Great Plains (GXP) workout. Since then, the spread has been steadily closing. When I wrote the first post, the spread was at 21%. Today, that gap has closed to around 7%. Had you or I invested around that time, we would already be sitting on a nice gain of ~10% with very low risk.

What’s Been Happening

Not much to be honest. From the last Aquila post, progress is still the same. Aquila and Great Plains haven’t been able to receive the OK from the Missouri commission to close the deal. Although it’s pretty obvious by now that neither side will cancel the deal, the fate of the merger rests with the Missouri commission.

What Have I Been Doing?

I have an SEC RSS for Aquila in my reader, along with all the other companies I am interested in, which I check daily for news. As I kept monitoring the SEC filings, I noticed that many of the insiders started to exercise their options (edit: they vested not exercised). It could have been a sign that they believed the merger was coming to a close. Luckily around this time, I took a position and the price kept its slow and steady climb up to where it is now.

Next Steps?

With the new deadline set to August 6, waiting out 3 months for a possible extra 7% gain isn’t all that appealing to me. If the price goes up a couple extra points up to my sell price, I plan to offload. Considering this was close to a 0% volatility play with a return of 5-6% so far in 2.5 weeks, I would say it is working out pretty well.

As we get closer towards the deadline, if there is around 3 weeks to go with everything looking good and the spread still being around 7% I’ll definitely think about buying another position for a excellent annualized gain.

In the meantime, I’ll be busy reading a bunch of books that I bought recently and looking for the next workout. I was hoping CMLS had more of a chance but that one fell through.

A Look at Aquila (ILA) Arbitrage

In continuation from the arbitrage post, here I will give an example of a current pending merger with a price spread of 21% annualised to 178%. With the economy in a recession and things not looking to brighten up anytime soon, studying and practicing anti-recession techniques may be one of the few things that saves you.

Basics of the Merger

The deal was first announced in Feb 2, 2007 so the deal has been ongoing for more than 1 year now. The condition of the deal is that

At the effective time of the Merger, each share of Aquila common stock will convert into the right to receive 0.0856 of a share of Great Plains Energy common stock and a cash payment of $1.80. The exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted to reflect stock price changes prior to the completion of the Merger.

This tells us that the closing price will vary depending on the price of Great Plains Energy at the completion of the deal. With GXP last trading at $24.70 on Mar 19, the closing price for ILA comes out to $3.92. With the current price of ILA being $3.24 here is a potential gain of 21% or 178% annualised. Not a bad return, but only if it plays out without any surprises.

Termination of the Merger

Based on the contractual agreements as outlined in the DEFM14 Proxy form, both parties of the merger can terminate the deal if it has not closed by Feb 6 2008. Obvioiusly, the deal was not completed and so the initial termination date was extended to May 1 but is subject to extension until August 6, 2008. Simply put, if the deal doesn’t close by May 1, the deadline can be extended again or any side of the party can choose to terminate the deal.

With both sides investing heavily into completing this deal, as well as Aquila spending $2.3 million and $16.6 million due to investment banking and legal costs in 2006 & 2007 respectively and $8.8 million in retaining non executive employees, I can’t seem to see a reason why the company would want to cancel the deal.

However, should Aquila or Great Plains Energy decide to terminate the deal, a $45 million termination fee would have to be paid to the other party. Compared to other mergers where the fee is around $15-25 million, this fee is quite a sum of money and one which neither company would want to pay.

Approvals

The deal so far has been slow but steady. All approvals have been obtained except from the Missouri Commission.

Check the proxy statement and you will notice the list of approvals that are required for the merger to complete. From that list, everything seems to be in place and only one approval remains. The Missouri Commission.

Additionally, shareholders from both ends have approved the deal.

Completion Conditions

All approval hurdles are close to being clear but it doesn’t just end there. For this deal to complete, Aquila has to complete an asset sale to Black Hills. Once the deal between Aquila and Great Plains have been finalised, the sale between Aquila and Black Hills must be completed in order for the deal to close. (edit: I really meant the sale to Black Hills must be completed before the deal between Aquila and Great Plains is completed. I meant “finalised” in the sense of receiving all approvals.)

This deal is dependent on all 3 parties which can complicate things because it requires due diligence from all 3 parties. If one side screws up, the other 2 are in danger of falling through as well.

But Now What?

From my previous post, there was a list of 7 points.

  1. Due diligence by both parties;
  2. Agree on a price, terms, and contingencies (financing, regulator approval);
  3. Get preliminary shareholder sentiment (or controlling shareholder approval);
  4. Secure financing arrangements (if needed);
  5. Obtain regulator (SEC, FCC, any and all) approval;
  6. Get final shareholder approval at a meeting called for that purpose;
  7. Complete the deal.

Now the important thing is to check, double check and triple check your data is correct and satisfies the above conditions in order to make as safe a bet as possible.

There is a Risk

There is no such thing as 100% risk free when involved in the market. However, the purpose of any intelligent investing is to find odds with low risk but high return. Just because they are so far into the merger, it seems like the deal will definitely close, but crazy and unexpected things can happen. Arbitrage is for people who either enjoy or are capable of ripping apart and analyzing documents, news and details so do your homework before jumping in. Otherwise that is just gambling.

The risks are also explained in the proxy statement.

What Would I Do + Disclaimer

First of all, I don’t hold any share of ILA and this is just a suggestion for further research. But I am keeping my eye on this for a reason. Because I believe the odds of winning are higher than losing. If the odds of winning are in your favour and if you continue to be disciplined and do the same thing over and over again, probability tells you that you will come out on top. Sure there wil be losers mixed in, but if I’m sure I can win overall, that is my goal.

With my previous workouts, I usually only purchase when all approvals have been obtained. With Missouri being what I deem to the last “big” hurdle, my cash is safe in my pocket for now.

But I would love to hear what you think and would do.