<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value Stock Investment Criteria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/?source=rss</link>
	<description>Excel DCF Stock Valuation Spreadsheet and Calculator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-3519</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=2574#comment-3519</guid>
		<description>Tyler,

check out this link. It&#039;s an aussie based value investing asset management company. They have lots of good stuff and analysis.

http://www.intelligentinvestor.com.au/articles/Telstra-TLS/Telstra-structural-separation-coverage.cfm?articleID=1020426</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler,</p>
<p>check out this link. It&#8217;s an aussie based value investing asset management company. They have lots of good stuff and analysis.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.intelligentinvestor.com.au/articles/Telstra-TLS/Telstra-structural-separation-coverage.cfm?articleID=1020426" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.intelligentinvestor.com.au/articles/Telstra-TLS/Telstra-structural-separation-coverage.cfm?articleID=1020426&amp;referer=');">http://www.intelligentinvestor.com.au/articles/Telstra-TLS/Telstra-structural-separation-coverage.cfm?articleID=1020426</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tylergold</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-3470</link>
		<dc:creator>Tylergold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=2574#comment-3470</guid>
		<description>i was look today at the Historical P/e of indexes. The Results: Disturbing

Average P/e ratio for SP500 At March Low = 15
Major Bear Market Lows For SP500 = 7-9
Average P/e ration for SP500 Now = 20


P/e ratio of ASX All Ords At March Low = 8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was look today at the Historical P/e of indexes. The Results: Disturbing</p>
<p>Average P/e ratio for SP500 At March Low = 15<br />
Major Bear Market Lows For SP500 = 7-9<br />
Average P/e ration for SP500 Now = 20</p>
<p>P/e ratio of ASX All Ords At March Low = 8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tylergold</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-3469</link>
		<dc:creator>Tylergold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=2574#comment-3469</guid>
		<description>Why are larger Companies not near their nnwc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are larger Companies not near their nnwc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-3462</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=2574#comment-3462</guid>
		<description>Telstra is a large company so you&#039;ll never see it at NNWC or anywhere close. Also if an investment requires you to look at so many things in order to decide whether it is a good opportunity or not, it usually isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telstra is a large company so you&#8217;ll never see it at NNWC or anywhere close. Also if an investment requires you to look at so many things in order to decide whether it is a good opportunity or not, it usually isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-3457</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=2574#comment-3457</guid>
		<description>Page 8,11,17,18,22,23
Have A Look Please Jae
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20090813/pdf/31k250lz9d30z5.pdf
And The NNWC is not $1.05</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page 8,11,17,18,22,23<br />
Have A Look Please Jae<br />
<a href="http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20090813/pdf/31k250lz9d30z5.pdf" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20090813/pdf/31k250lz9d30z5.pdf?referer=');">http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20090813/pdf/31k250lz9d30z5.pdf</a><br />
And The NNWC is not $1.05</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-3456</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=2574#comment-3456</guid>
		<description>however the NNWC is about $1.05 per share</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>however the NNWC is about $1.05 per share</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: market volatility and how to handle it</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-3455</link>
		<dc:creator>market volatility and how to handle it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=2574#comment-3455</guid>
		<description>[...] also explained that a no brainer value investment criteria has to be simple. Don&#8217;t cloud your thoughts and facts with information that isn&#8217;t very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #d9f9ff !important;<br />
color: #d9f9ff;">
<p>[...] also explained that a no brainer value investment criteria has to be simple. Don&#8217;t cloud your thoughts and facts with information that isn&#8217;t very [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-3452</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=2574#comment-3452</guid>
		<description>The DCF of TLS.AX is $4.90 at growth of 4% and discount at 11%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DCF of TLS.AX is $4.90 at growth of 4% and discount at 11%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-3451</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=2574#comment-3451</guid>
		<description>Graham Formula At 5% Growth 
= $6.66  

DCF = $5.33 At 4% forever growth. And a DR of 11%


Telstra looks cheap, not ridiculously cheap.

And The CEO that was horrible is gone

Profit this year was up 9% and revenue up 3%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham Formula At 5% Growth<br />
= $6.66  </p>
<p>DCF = $5.33 At 4% forever growth. And a DR of 11%</p>
<p>Telstra looks cheap, not ridiculously cheap.</p>
<p>And The CEO that was horrible is gone</p>
<p>Profit this year was up 9% and revenue up 3%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Links: October 11, 2009 &#124; Dividends Value</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-perspective/value-stock-investing-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-3447</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Links: October 11, 2009 &#124; Dividends Value</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=2574#comment-3447</guid>
		<description>[...] Old School Value presented Value Stock Investment Criteria [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #d9f9ff !important;<br />
color: #d9f9ff;">
<p>[...] Old School Value presented Value Stock Investment Criteria [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
