<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Negative Enterprise Value Stocks for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/?source=rss</link>
	<description>DCF Stock Valuation Spreadsheet and Intrinsic Value Calculator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-5986</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=3071#comment-5986</guid>
		<description>@ Dom,
Yes that is the formula for excess cash that I used in following posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dom,<br />
Yes that is the formula for excess cash that I used in following posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-5980</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=3071#comment-5980</guid>
		<description>In your excess cash formula you assume that the company has &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; amount of excess cash. Wouldn&#039;t a better formula be:

Excess Cash = MAX(0,Total Cash – MAX(0,Current Liabilities-Current Assets))

As I&#039;ve written it the formula will result to &quot;0&quot; for companies that have no excess cash whereas your formula will generate a negative number (the excess cash shortage). Or should we include the cash shortage?

For example I was reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/194-focusing-on-the-business-to-save-money&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joe Ponzio&#039;s article on JTX&lt;/a&gt;. If I run your excess cash formula for the year ended 4/2009, I get negative $41 million. With my formula, it calculates to zero. Which is right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your excess cash formula you assume that the company has <em>some</em> amount of excess cash. Wouldn&#8217;t a better formula be:</p>
<p>Excess Cash = MAX(0,Total Cash – MAX(0,Current Liabilities-Current Assets))</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve written it the formula will result to &#8220;0&#8243; for companies that have no excess cash whereas your formula will generate a negative number (the excess cash shortage). Or should we include the cash shortage?</p>
<p>For example I was reading <a href="http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/194-focusing-on-the-business-to-save-money" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fwallstreet.com/article/194-focusing-on-the-business-to-save-money?referer=');">Joe Ponzio&#8217;s article on JTX</a>. If I run your excess cash formula for the year ended 4/2009, I get negative $41 million. With my formula, it calculates to zero. Which is right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zehua</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-5150</link>
		<dc:creator>zehua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 02:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=3071#comment-5150</guid>
		<description>Hi Jae,
   I see many of your stocks in the neg. enterprise value are actually foreign stocks. I doubt if the currency conversion is correct, because stocks like IMOS seem to have far more debt than cash.


Thanks,
Zehua</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jae,<br />
   I see many of your stocks in the neg. enterprise value are actually foreign stocks. I doubt if the currency conversion is correct, because stocks like IMOS seem to have far more debt than cash.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Zehua</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Negative Enterprise Value Stock Screen Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-4977</link>
		<dc:creator>Negative Enterprise Value Stock Screen Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=3071#comment-4977</guid>
		<description>[...] not surprised that negative EV stocks perform well overall given that even my random set of neg EV stocks beat the market last year. But over a span of 9-10 years, the result is mind blowing. Negative Enterprise Value [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #d9f9ff !important;<br />
color: #d9f9ff;">
<p>[...] not surprised that negative EV stocks perform well overall given that even my random set of neg EV stocks beat the market last year. But over a span of 9-10 years, the result is mind blowing. Negative Enterprise Value [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-4535</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=3071#comment-4535</guid>
		<description>1. Total cash is cash and equivalents.
2. Yes you are correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Total cash is cash and equivalents.<br />
2. Yes you are correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-4530</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=3071#comment-4530</guid>
		<description>I have a question about the formula on Excess cash. Does total cash means Cash flow from operation ? 2nd, if current assets is greater than current liabilities then Excess cash = Total cash - 0 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question about the formula on Excess cash. Does total cash means Cash flow from operation ? 2nd, if current assets is greater than current liabilities then Excess cash = Total cash &#8211; 0 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Reading Links &#8211; January 3, 2010 &#124; Finance Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-4093</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reading Links &#8211; January 3, 2010 &#124; Finance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=3071#comment-4093</guid>
		<description>[...] Old School Value presented Negative Enterprise Value Stocks for 2010 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #d9f9ff !important;<br />
color: #d9f9ff;">
<p>[...] Old School Value presented Negative Enterprise Value Stocks for 2010 [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Wisdom Roundup #59 (Weekly Readings For Smarter Types) &#124; Economic models &#124; Alphaverse.com</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Wisdom Roundup #59 (Weekly Readings For Smarter Types) &#124; Economic models &#124; Alphaverse.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=3071#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>[...] Negative Enterprise Value Stocks for 2010 - Via Old School Value &#8211; Since enterprise value accounts for debt and subtracts the excess cash from the equation, if the formula above results in a negative number, the conclusion is that the company is loaded with excess cash, hence a cash rich company trading for less than it’s value. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #d9f9ff !important;<br />
color: #d9f9ff;">
<p>[...] Negative Enterprise Value Stocks for 2010 &#8211; Via Old School Value &#8211; Since enterprise value accounts for debt and subtracts the excess cash from the equation, if the formula above results in a negative number, the conclusion is that the company is loaded with excess cash, hence a cash rich company trading for less than it’s value. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-4066</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=3071#comment-4066</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t use the yahoo screener this time.
Used the NYT screener. Found that it had more stocks in the database as it included OTC stocks as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t use the yahoo screener this time.<br />
Used the NYT screener. Found that it had more stocks in the database as it included OTC stocks as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMD</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/investing-strategy/negative-enterprise-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-4065</link>
		<dc:creator>SMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=3071#comment-4065</guid>
		<description>Hi Jae

Ran the Yahoo screener using the criteria set out in your March email but results are different than those posted above (both in population and enterprise value). Grateful if you could explain the discrepancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jae</p>
<p>Ran the Yahoo screener using the criteria set out in your March email but results are different than those posted above (both in population and enterprise value). Grateful if you could explain the discrepancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 37/58 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk

Served from: www.oldschoolvalue.com @ 2010-07-30 11:47:31 -->