<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: List of Merger Arbitrages for 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/?source=rss</link>
	<description>Perform Stock Valuation Automatically</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:05:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1506</guid>
		<description>EMAG back to where it was again so quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMAG back to where it was again so quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKL</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>MKL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>Yes.  It&#039;s ok.  I read that one link about SIB &quot;losing control&quot; of ELAN, and I wondered if the money freed up from that earlier in February wasn&#039;t deliberate on SIB&#039;s part to free up money for EMAG which closes tomorrow.  We found as much as we could.  Remember HSSO&#039;s presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  It&#8217;s ok.  I read that one link about SIB &#8220;losing control&#8221; of ELAN, and I wondered if the money freed up from that earlier in February wasn&#8217;t deliberate on SIB&#8217;s part to free up money for EMAG which closes tomorrow.  We found as much as we could.  Remember HSSO&#8217;s presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1504</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1504</guid>
		<description>and I put in another buy order at 2.64 which was filled as soon as I left this morning.... grrr

It had dropped to $2.00 at one point. Stop losses are being filled as the market is tanking. Glad I didn&#039;t put a stop loss as I would have lost quite a lot.

No news either so need to calm down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I put in another buy order at 2.64 which was filled as soon as I left this morning&#8230;. grrr</p>
<p>It had dropped to $2.00 at one point. Stop losses are being filled as the market is tanking. Glad I didn&#8217;t put a stop loss as I would have lost quite a lot.</p>
<p>No news either so need to calm down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKL</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>MKL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>DISK too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DISK too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>There was an EMAG SEC filing released yesterday.  Looks like Prescott sold all of its shares, but I after a very brief read, looks like that was in late January so it should not be news now.  Can&#039;t find anything else, but it is recovering a bit now.  Perhaps it was a large sell order that hit a thinly traded stock.  Question now is do you add on the decline or sell out a bit just to be cautious?  The life of a trader....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was an EMAG SEC filing released yesterday.  Looks like Prescott sold all of its shares, but I after a very brief read, looks like that was in late January so it should not be news now.  Can&#8217;t find anything else, but it is recovering a bit now.  Perhaps it was a large sell order that hit a thinly traded stock.  Question now is do you add on the decline or sell out a bit just to be cautious?  The life of a trader&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering if it isn&#039;t profit taking as I can&#039;t seem to find any news from EMAG this morning to explain the drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if it isn&#8217;t profit taking as I can&#8217;t seem to find any news from EMAG this morning to explain the drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>Any news on what is going on with EMAG this morning???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any news on what is going on with EMAG this morning???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>New arbitrage opportunity-- Symbol: DFZ. The stock closed at $6.20/shr. today. The  company received an unsolicited offer to buy all shares for a price between $7.00 and 7.75/shr. The offer came from Mill Road Capital based in Connecticut. 

Article about the potential deal: http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2164230/

The article states that the board of directors is reviewing the offer and should make a decision within a month. This could be a shot at a quick 12%+ return in as little as 4-6 weeks. 

Has anyone else looked into this potential arbitrage play?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New arbitrage opportunity&#8211; Symbol: DFZ. The stock closed at $6.20/shr. today. The  company received an unsolicited offer to buy all shares for a price between $7.00 and 7.75/shr. The offer came from Mill Road Capital based in Connecticut. </p>
<p>Article about the potential deal: <a href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2164230/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock_20News/2164230/?referer=');">http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2164230/</a></p>
<p>The article states that the board of directors is reviewing the offer and should make a decision within a month. This could be a shot at a quick 12%+ return in as little as 4-6 weeks. </p>
<p>Has anyone else looked into this potential arbitrage play?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>New merger arbitrage idea--Symbol is DFZ. A couple of days ago the company announced that they had received an unsolicited offer to buy the shares at a price between $7 and $7.75 each. This leaves a spread of around 17% if you can get the shares at $6 and assume that they&#039;ll receive the lower end of the unsolicited bid. The company that made the offer is a private equity firm by the name of Mill Road Capital based in Connecticut. 

According to the story at http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2164230/ the company&#039;s board is expected to make a decision during this next month. 

Quickly glancing at some key stats for DFZ from yahoo finance, I see that they have about $27M of cash ($2.60+ per share) and they only have $2.43M of debt. I&#039;ll have to dig deeper on this one. Anyone looking at this one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New merger arbitrage idea&#8211;Symbol is DFZ. A couple of days ago the company announced that they had received an unsolicited offer to buy the shares at a price between $7 and $7.75 each. This leaves a spread of around 17% if you can get the shares at $6 and assume that they&#8217;ll receive the lower end of the unsolicited bid. The company that made the offer is a private equity firm by the name of Mill Road Capital based in Connecticut. </p>
<p>According to the story at <a href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2164230/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock_20News/2164230/?referer=');">http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2164230/</a> the company&#8217;s board is expected to make a decision during this next month. </p>
<p>Quickly glancing at some key stats for DFZ from yahoo finance, I see that they have about $27M of cash ($2.60+ per share) and they only have $2.43M of debt. I&#8217;ll have to dig deeper on this one. Anyone looking at this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKL</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>MKL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>I really do like the spread on DISK.  I really DO like that DISK went up today 30%.  I just can&#039;t trust Nyx.  I&#039;ve googled Q-Black and Joe Q. Bretz.  Nyx Acquisitions is an affiliate of Q-Black, run by Joe Q.  I know it&#039;s a private company and doesn&#039;t need to communicate, but it DOESN&quot;T COMMUNICATE!  Items I have found are of Joe Q starting up a management relationship (managing and promoting) with a band called Mouth to Mouth (in Austin) and then.. there is nothing.  Apparently Q-Black has nightclubs, movies, bands, etc., but I can&#039;t find anything they DO HAVE ONGOING communications about other than the current film &quot;The Chosen One&quot;.  Which isn&#039;t to say that they do not have these enterprises, I just don&#039;t want to guess, or hope blindly.  What nightclub do they own??  There is a restaurant in SF called &quot;Q&quot; but they don&#039;t claim to own it, nor does Q name their owner.  Whoops that&#039;s just me guessing because I want it to be that.

Perhaps their solution to this dilemma is their newly announced relationship with Placemaking Group as their PR agents.  But that&#039;s me guessing again because I want the 152% spread as of today!

With &quot;no financing conditions&quot;, where does their money come from??

I did find an article about the previous attempt at a merger/takeover of DISK saying that DISK was finally so relieved to have a real deal on their hands.  They had had a full year of back-and-forthing breach of contract allegations, and finally Nyx stepped ably in...  And now...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really do like the spread on DISK.  I really DO like that DISK went up today 30%.  I just can&#8217;t trust Nyx.  I&#8217;ve googled Q-Black and Joe Q. Bretz.  Nyx Acquisitions is an affiliate of Q-Black, run by Joe Q.  I know it&#8217;s a private company and doesn&#8217;t need to communicate, but it DOESN&#8221;T COMMUNICATE!  Items I have found are of Joe Q starting up a management relationship (managing and promoting) with a band called Mouth to Mouth (in Austin) and then.. there is nothing.  Apparently Q-Black has nightclubs, movies, bands, etc., but I can&#8217;t find anything they DO HAVE ONGOING communications about other than the current film &#8220;The Chosen One&#8221;.  Which isn&#8217;t to say that they do not have these enterprises, I just don&#8217;t want to guess, or hope blindly.  What nightclub do they own??  There is a restaurant in SF called &#8220;Q&#8221; but they don&#8217;t claim to own it, nor does Q name their owner.  Whoops that&#8217;s just me guessing because I want it to be that.</p>
<p>Perhaps their solution to this dilemma is their newly announced relationship with Placemaking Group as their PR agents.  But that&#8217;s me guessing again because I want the 152% spread as of today!</p>
<p>With &#8220;no financing conditions&#8221;, where does their money come from??</p>
<p>I did find an article about the previous attempt at a merger/takeover of DISK saying that DISK was finally so relieved to have a real deal on their hands.  They had had a full year of back-and-forthing breach of contract allegations, and finally Nyx stepped ably in&#8230;  And now&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1492</guid>
		<description>Icahn does hold 800k.
http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/921669/000092847508000408/frm13fhrcci93008.txt

But it is very small compared to his portfolio. It only makes up 0.23% of his portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Icahn does hold 800k.<br />
<a href="http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/921669/000092847508000408/frm13fhrcci93008.txt" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/921669/000092847508000408/frm13fhrcci93008.txt?referer=');">http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/921669/000092847508000408/frm13fhrcci93008.txt</a></p>
<p>But it is very small compared to his portfolio. It only makes up 0.23% of his portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKL</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>MKL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>Icahn Capital Management and &quot;Carl C Icahn et al&quot; are two separately listed owners of FOR.  I will try the SEC search.  I did find in gurufocus the price ranges you mentioned Andrei, but the SEC is a primary source, so I will go there.  He would seem to present a potential monkeywrench in my plans if it wasn&#039;t to his liking.

That DISK is getting away from me today, and I think someone knows something somewhere.  Probably a letter will come out soon, from Nyx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Icahn Capital Management and &#8220;Carl C Icahn et al&#8221; are two separately listed owners of FOR.  I will try the SEC search.  I did find in gurufocus the price ranges you mentioned Andrei, but the SEC is a primary source, so I will go there.  He would seem to present a potential monkeywrench in my plans if it wasn&#8217;t to his liking.</p>
<p>That DISK is getting away from me today, and I think someone knows something somewhere.  Probably a letter will come out soon, from Nyx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>I think the way it would be done is that  you can go to the SEC website and try to search by company name in the full text search. So you would type in Forestar and look for form 4 filings for Carl Icahn. Those should tell you what he acquired and at what price for the date ranges in question. Please correct me if I&#039;m wrong though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the way it would be done is that  you can go to the SEC website and try to search by company name in the full text search. So you would type in Forestar and look for form 4 filings for Carl Icahn. Those should tell you what he acquired and at what price for the date ranges in question. Please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>I believe you can search for his Form 13F which discloses his funds positions. Im not sure what the name of his fund is though as I&#039;ve never really followed him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you can search for his Form 13F which discloses his funds positions. Im not sure what the name of his fund is though as I&#8217;ve never really followed him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKL</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>MKL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>Thank you.  I believe you guys.  I also read that seekingalpha article, but she didn&#039;t say where she got her information (doesn&#039;t mean it isn&#039;t right!) so I went looking.  I only know MFFAIS and it records the reported date.  To me that could mean the date it was reported to MFFAIS which could be completely irrelevant.  However it&#039;s all I have so I looked in mid November 2008 (being the last &quot;report&quot; of acquisition) and the price range then was $3 to $5.  And that&#039;s just from the graph on Google finance.

I will have a look at gurufocus.

Andrei, how would I verify with the SEC filings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  I believe you guys.  I also read that seekingalpha article, but she didn&#8217;t say where she got her information (doesn&#8217;t mean it isn&#8217;t right!) so I went looking.  I only know MFFAIS and it records the reported date.  To me that could mean the date it was reported to MFFAIS which could be completely irrelevant.  However it&#8217;s all I have so I looked in mid November 2008 (being the last &#8220;report&#8221; of acquisition) and the price range then was $3 to $5.  And that&#8217;s just from the graph on Google finance.</p>
<p>I will have a look at gurufocus.</p>
<p>Andrei, how would I verify with the SEC filings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>According to gurufocus Icahn reported his first ownership interest in FOR at the end of Dec. 2007. At the time shares were trading in a range between $22.60 and $24.25. He averaged down it looks like in the 1st three months of 2008 when shares traded between $19.05 and $27.95. 

Still have to verify with the SEC filings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to gurufocus Icahn reported his first ownership interest in FOR at the end of Dec. 2007. At the time shares were trading in a range between $22.60 and $24.25. He averaged down it looks like in the 1st three months of 2008 when shares traded between $19.05 and $27.95. </p>
<p>Still have to verify with the SEC filings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>Regarding ANL...  All I can find extension of the tender offer is the two shareholder suits mentioned above.  One was settled in January and the other request for an injunction was denied on Feb 3.  There are no other suits that I can find, but also no press releases or information saying that the suits were the cause of the extension.  Again, only 88% of the shares need to be tendered and as of Feb 5, 93% were tendered so this cannot be the holdup.  If anyone else can figure out this mystery, I would love their input.

MKL, your last post says Icahn got his shares for less than the offer price, but the seeking alpha article that you mentioned above says that he bought his for more than $15 and speculates that he might not be willing to sell out for a loss.  I have not looked myself to see which is correct, but perhaps we need some clarity on that issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding ANL&#8230;  All I can find extension of the tender offer is the two shareholder suits mentioned above.  One was settled in January and the other request for an injunction was denied on Feb 3.  There are no other suits that I can find, but also no press releases or information saying that the suits were the cause of the extension.  Again, only 88% of the shares need to be tendered and as of Feb 5, 93% were tendered so this cannot be the holdup.  If anyone else can figure out this mystery, I would love their input.</p>
<p>MKL, your last post says Icahn got his shares for less than the offer price, but the seeking alpha article that you mentioned above says that he bought his for more than $15 and speculates that he might not be willing to sell out for a loss.  I have not looked myself to see which is correct, but perhaps we need some clarity on that issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKL</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>MKL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>Jae Jun, Holland Ware made the offer, or his charitable trust did, a 501c3.  His trust owns land in Georgia and Texas, and FOR owns land.  His offer is being considered by FOR.  Icahn is the second largest holder, after Barclays (which also owned EMAG and PSD).  

The offer was lettered February 2, 2009, and it said HWare is &quot;prepared  to make a cash tender offer for any and all shares at $15 per share, under certain conditions, including support of the Board of Directors for the tender offer and mutual agreement on related matters such as Board representation and waiver of the Company’s Rights Agreement.&quot;

It&#039;s been seven days so they must be still communicating with their board and major shareholders.  I hope they speak soon.

Icahn and Barclays appear to have acquired their shares in mid November 2008, when the price appears to have between $3 and $5.  I can&#039;t imagine that their major shareholders are interested in putting up a fight to hold out for more than $15.  Though Icahn and Barclays are the largest shareholders, FOR is by no means anything but smallfry on their portfolios.  Unless its future value is..  Even then, one in the hand is worth two in the bush.

I&#039;ve got a magnifying glass on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jae Jun, Holland Ware made the offer, or his charitable trust did, a 501c3.  His trust owns land in Georgia and Texas, and FOR owns land.  His offer is being considered by FOR.  Icahn is the second largest holder, after Barclays (which also owned EMAG and PSD).  </p>
<p>The offer was lettered February 2, 2009, and it said HWare is &#8220;prepared  to make a cash tender offer for any and all shares at $15 per share, under certain conditions, including support of the Board of Directors for the tender offer and mutual agreement on related matters such as Board representation and waiver of the Company’s Rights Agreement.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been seven days so they must be still communicating with their board and major shareholders.  I hope they speak soon.</p>
<p>Icahn and Barclays appear to have acquired their shares in mid November 2008, when the price appears to have between $3 and $5.  I can&#8217;t imagine that their major shareholders are interested in putting up a fight to hold out for more than $15.  Though Icahn and Barclays are the largest shareholders, FOR is by no means anything but smallfry on their portfolios.  Unless its future value is..  Even then, one in the hand is worth two in the bush.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a magnifying glass on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>@ MKL

I may have to start looking into FOR to see why the spread is so large.

@ John,
I still havent been able to read up on ANL. Was too busy to be on the computer over the weekend. Hope to get a chance to catch up before I miss the boat completely.

I&#039;m with Fidelity and they charge $20 for a tender plus the commission of $10.95. So $42 in fees alone... need to see how my much money I will need to invest to get that expense ratio down..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ MKL</p>
<p>I may have to start looking into FOR to see why the spread is so large.</p>
<p>@ John,<br />
I still havent been able to read up on ANL. Was too busy to be on the computer over the weekend. Hope to get a chance to catch up before I miss the boat completely.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Fidelity and they charge $20 for a tender plus the commission of $10.95. So $42 in fees alone&#8230; need to see how my much money I will need to invest to get that expense ratio down..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/special_situation/list-of-merger-arbitrages-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=305#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>Jae

As for a specific date to purchase by... I am not aware of any such stipulation.  I use Ameritrade as my broker and the only thing that you need to worry about is if you do decide to tender the shares, with Ameritrade, you must do so before 4pm est on Feb 17.  If you tender your shares you should see your money within 14 days (usually sooner).  In the ANL case, if you do not tender your shares, you will still get bought out, but those that tender get their transactions filled sooner.  In my opinion, the best thing to do is to try to sell out on or before the expiration date on the open market so that you get your money immediately.  Hopefully, you only lose a few cents per share off the deal price by doing that.  Also, if the tender offer is extended (which seems to happen often) you can Un-tender your shares and sell them on the open market yourself.

Thanks for the info on the suit, MKL.  I&#039;ll have to look into that as well.  I also have FOR on my radar as well as HLND which had a similar offer from the Chairman to take it private for $9.50.  There has been no response that I have seen so far.  Other less lucrative positions that I am looking at and would welcome any feedback are ALDN, WSTF, and PDGI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jae</p>
<p>As for a specific date to purchase by&#8230; I am not aware of any such stipulation.  I use Ameritrade as my broker and the only thing that you need to worry about is if you do decide to tender the shares, with Ameritrade, you must do so before 4pm est on Feb 17.  If you tender your shares you should see your money within 14 days (usually sooner).  In the ANL case, if you do not tender your shares, you will still get bought out, but those that tender get their transactions filled sooner.  In my opinion, the best thing to do is to try to sell out on or before the expiration date on the open market so that you get your money immediately.  Hopefully, you only lose a few cents per share off the deal price by doing that.  Also, if the tender offer is extended (which seems to happen often) you can Un-tender your shares and sell them on the open market yourself.</p>
<p>Thanks for the info on the suit, MKL.  I&#8217;ll have to look into that as well.  I also have FOR on my radar as well as HLND which had a similar offer from the Chairman to take it private for $9.50.  There has been no response that I have seen so far.  Other less lucrative positions that I am looking at and would welcome any feedback are ALDN, WSTF, and PDGI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 705/708 objects using eaccelerator
Content Delivery Network via Cdn.oldschoolvalue.com

Served from: www.oldschoolvalue.com @ 2012-02-12 06:31:26 -->
