<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mergers and Acquisitions Arbitrage Activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/?source=rss</link>
	<description>DCF Stock Valuation Spreadsheet and Intrinsic Value Calculator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-2371</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1119#comment-2371</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the updates John. I appreciated the research you&#039;ve done and I&#039;m sure others do as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the updates John. I appreciated the research you&#8217;ve done and I&#8217;m sure others do as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-2366</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1119#comment-2366</guid>
		<description>Sorry for two posts but I got curious after my last one and checked into the NCX deal a bit more.  Found this on MSN Money which may answer my question about Canadian approvals:

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission granted early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and the Commissioner of Competition appointed under the Competition Act (Canada) issued a “no-action” letter advising the parties in writing that she does not have grounds on which to initiate proceedings before the Competition Tribunal under the merger provisions of the Competition Act (Canada). 

I may take a position in NCX this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for two posts but I got curious after my last one and checked into the NCX deal a bit more.  Found this on MSN Money which may answer my question about Canadian approvals:</p>
<p>The U.S. Federal Trade Commission granted early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and the Commissioner of Competition appointed under the Competition Act (Canada) issued a “no-action” letter advising the parties in writing that she does not have grounds on which to initiate proceedings before the Competition Tribunal under the merger provisions of the Competition Act (Canada). </p>
<p>I may take a position in NCX this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-2365</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1119#comment-2365</guid>
		<description>Just a quick note on NCX...  I don&#039;t hold a position because of something I heard awhile back that could cause a problem with the merger and could be why the spread is as wide as it is.  I never followed up so I would be interested to hear any feedback, but the article that I read mentioned some worry of the formation of a monopoly and that the Canadian gov&#039;t could get involved and strike the deal down because of a nationalistic stance.

Paul mentions the other conditions that have been satisfied, but I am pretty sure that the deal required some kind of Canadian Government agency ok.

I am playing ENPT, but small because of some shady dealings that I have read about the Din family.  Again, not sure what to believe, as much of this was posted on message boards by less than reputable sources, but I think there is some cause for caution.  I am beginning to question the lack of a set date for the shareholder meeting.  I hope this is resolved soon.  I might be more willing to take a bigger position then.

Any other opinions would be much appreciated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note on NCX&#8230;  I don&#8217;t hold a position because of something I heard awhile back that could cause a problem with the merger and could be why the spread is as wide as it is.  I never followed up so I would be interested to hear any feedback, but the article that I read mentioned some worry of the formation of a monopoly and that the Canadian gov&#8217;t could get involved and strike the deal down because of a nationalistic stance.</p>
<p>Paul mentions the other conditions that have been satisfied, but I am pretty sure that the deal required some kind of Canadian Government agency ok.</p>
<p>I am playing ENPT, but small because of some shady dealings that I have read about the Din family.  Again, not sure what to believe, as much of this was posted on message boards by less than reputable sources, but I think there is some cause for caution.  I am beginning to question the lack of a set date for the shareholder meeting.  I hope this is resolved soon.  I might be more willing to take a bigger position then.</p>
<p>Any other opinions would be much appreciated&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 07:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1119#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@ Paul&lt;/strong&gt;,

Thanks for the idea and update Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@ Paul</strong>,</p>
<p>Thanks for the idea and update Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1119#comment-2342</guid>
		<description>@Tristin - I like the ENPT and NCX deals. 

With NCX - the spread may not be large but the risk seems low.
1) shareholder approval
2) EU antitrust approval
3) No financing conditions

I don&#039;t hold a position in ENPT.
I do hold a position in NCX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tristin &#8211; I like the ENPT and NCX deals. </p>
<p>With NCX &#8211; the spread may not be large but the risk seems low.<br />
1) shareholder approval<br />
2) EU antitrust approval<br />
3) No financing conditions</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hold a position in ENPT.<br />
I do hold a position in NCX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-2339</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1119#comment-2339</guid>
		<description>Hi Tristan,

I haven&#039;t been looking at mergers lately. There just doesn&#039;t seem to be any really good ones. I&#039;m not interested in gaining 10% over 5-6 months. It just doesn&#039;t make sense.

The only one that may be worth the effort would probably be ENPT but that one still has over 1 1/2 months remaining.

With the market moving up, although it&#039;s unclear whether the upward movement can be sustained, arbitrage plays aren&#039;t so profitable. In a flat or down economy, yes. But if the market crashes again, I&#039;m hoping to pick up some great companies I have on my list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tristan,</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been looking at mergers lately. There just doesn&#8217;t seem to be any really good ones. I&#8217;m not interested in gaining 10% over 5-6 months. It just doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
<p>The only one that may be worth the effort would probably be ENPT but that one still has over 1 1/2 months remaining.</p>
<p>With the market moving up, although it&#8217;s unclear whether the upward movement can be sustained, arbitrage plays aren&#8217;t so profitable. In a flat or down economy, yes. But if the market crashes again, I&#8217;m hoping to pick up some great companies I have on my list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Luckett</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Luckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1119#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>Jae, 

I just started looking at Arb deals again. Anything on your radar?

Thanks, 
Tristan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jae, </p>
<p>I just started looking at Arb deals again. Anything on your radar?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Tristan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-2175</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1119#comment-2175</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t invest much into DISK knowing the risk. My other positions have balanced it out but I&#039;m holding and will see whether another company believes their assets is valuable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t invest much into DISK knowing the risk. My other positions have balanced it out but I&#8217;m holding and will see whether another company believes their assets is valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy and Hold Plus</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy and Hold Plus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1119#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>You know, it&#039;s funny you guys were talking about DISK.  I got burnt on DISK.

And then I&#039;m hoping for the ENPT deal to close like it&#039;s supposed to.

http://buyandholdplus.com/blogweb/index.php?/archives/50-New-Purchase-ENPT.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it&#8217;s funny you guys were talking about DISK.  I got burnt on DISK.</p>
<p>And then I&#8217;m hoping for the ENPT deal to close like it&#8217;s supposed to.</p>
<p><a href="http://buyandholdplus.com/blogweb/index.php?/archives/50-New-Purchase-ENPT.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/buyandholdplus.com/blogweb/index.php?/archives/50-New-Purchase-ENPT.html&amp;referer=');">http://buyandholdplus.com/blogweb/index.php?/archives/50-New-Purchase-ENPT.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/special_situation/mergers-acquisitions-arbitrage-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-2108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1119#comment-2108</guid>
		<description>I guess my impatience got the better of me again. Im holding a small portion of DISK at the moment.

As for stock deals, I don&#039;t like them period and I haven&#039;t shorted anything before, so I hope someone else here can answer your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my impatience got the better of me again. Im holding a small portion of DISK at the moment.</p>
<p>As for stock deals, I don&#8217;t like them period and I haven&#8217;t shorted anything before, so I hope someone else here can answer your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 37/58 queries in 0.081 seconds using disk

Served from: www.oldschoolvalue.com @ 2010-07-30 11:51:11 -->