<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Graham Net Net Stock IGOI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/?source=rss</link>
	<description>Excel DCF Stock Valuation Spreadsheet and Calculator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Portfolio Update July 2009 &#124; Old School Value</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Portfolio Update July 2009 &#124; Old School Value</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1927#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>[...] positions that have been doing well include IGOI and PDII. As I mentioned in my recent post on IGOI, the company has been able to increase their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #d9f9ff !important;<br />
color: #d9f9ff;">
<p>[...] positions that have been doing well include IGOI and PDII. As I mentioned in my recent post on IGOI, the company has been able to increase their [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/comment-page-1/#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1927#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>It was also related to the increase in distribution channels. They&#039;ve been able to enter more phone retailers which will get more eyeballs on their products.

IGOI seems to have some good things going. I&#039;ve got a nice gain so far but I feel there is more to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was also related to the increase in distribution channels. They&#8217;ve been able to enter more phone retailers which will get more eyeballs on their products.</p>
<p>IGOI seems to have some good things going. I&#8217;ve got a nice gain so far but I feel there is more to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/comment-page-1/#comment-2821</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1927#comment-2821</guid>
		<description>I like the new site layout.
.-= Mark&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/stockpursuit/VhAe/~3/Ux4GLyUa5TM/oil-technical-analysis-like-taking.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Oil Technical Analysis: Like Taking Candy From A Baby&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new site layout.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Mark&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/stockpursuit/VhAe/~3/Ux4GLyUa5TM/oil-technical-analysis-like-taking.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/feedproxy.google.com/_r/stockpursuit/VhAe/_3/Ux4GLyUa5TM/oil-technical-analysis-like-taking.html?referer=');">Oil Technical Analysis: Like Taking Candy From A Baby</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/comment-page-1/#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1927#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>nice find. I think it looks nice if it can break over .83. I&#039;m thinking this move is smart phone sympathy maybe. these tech net-net&#039;s sure have been flying lately.
.-= Mark&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/stockpursuit/VhAe/~3/Ux4GLyUa5TM/oil-technical-analysis-like-taking.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Oil Technical Analysis: Like Taking Candy From A Baby&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice find. I think it looks nice if it can break over .83. I&#8217;m thinking this move is smart phone sympathy maybe. these tech net-net&#8217;s sure have been flying lately.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Mark&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/stockpursuit/VhAe/~3/Ux4GLyUa5TM/oil-technical-analysis-like-taking.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/feedproxy.google.com/_r/stockpursuit/VhAe/_3/Ux4GLyUa5TM/oil-technical-analysis-like-taking.html?referer=');">Oil Technical Analysis: Like Taking Candy From A Baby</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/comment-page-1/#comment-2807</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1927#comment-2807</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info TJ. Will look into it a little more now that I have some cash available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info TJ. Will look into it a little more now that I have some cash available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1927#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>PRXI is another one of these troubled companies going for real cheap. I&#039;m just going to copy/paste from a couple e-mails I&#039;ve traded with friends to show you the basic outline here (this was before Q2 results came out a week or 2 ago, which I think were pretty decent but still gross, about what i expected)... i added in a few sentences just now but most is old :

PRXI- turnaround of a screwed up company but with a very good balance sheet.  The original CEO totally drove this thing into the ground, so a hedge fund guy that had a lot of shares fought against him, won, and is turning it around, or trying to.  they still have a lot of $, they are also the current salvor-in-possession of the titanic, they might lose that but they might not.  they own a bunch of stuff from the site already though, its been appraised at $46m but only on their books at $3m.  they might fail and liquidate, if they do that though you still might break even or even make $ because of all their assets and i don&#039;t think they&#039;ll hesitate to liquidate with Sellers Capital in control of the company.  if they succeed though this thing could be a 5-bagger.  i really like managements tone in their latest conference call, they are telling it exactly like it is, not that good.  priority 1 was stop cash burn, and they did that in Q1.  i think they have a decent shot at turning it around (30-50% i my best guess) and the risk:reward is good.  be careful though you could lose all your money, even though their titanic assets were appraised at 46m (the ones they own free and clear, there are others currently in a legal battle) who knows how liquid that market is or how much they&#039;d really get.  if they ended up only going for 20m that&#039;d be fine too the market cap of the company is only 20m itself.  

the wild card here is 50% dilution is coming through a debt deal with Sellers that is kind of a necessary evil.  also their legal battle over what their status is regarding the titanic wreck is still looming over the company, a bad result there wouldn&#039;t be that big a deal (so far the result was kinda bad but i think it&#039;s on appeal i&#039;m not quite sure) as they still have the artifacts i mentioned before, a good result there would be very beneficial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PRXI is another one of these troubled companies going for real cheap. I&#8217;m just going to copy/paste from a couple e-mails I&#8217;ve traded with friends to show you the basic outline here (this was before Q2 results came out a week or 2 ago, which I think were pretty decent but still gross, about what i expected)&#8230; i added in a few sentences just now but most is old :</p>
<p>PRXI- turnaround of a screwed up company but with a very good balance sheet.  The original CEO totally drove this thing into the ground, so a hedge fund guy that had a lot of shares fought against him, won, and is turning it around, or trying to.  they still have a lot of $, they are also the current salvor-in-possession of the titanic, they might lose that but they might not.  they own a bunch of stuff from the site already though, its been appraised at $46m but only on their books at $3m.  they might fail and liquidate, if they do that though you still might break even or even make $ because of all their assets and i don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll hesitate to liquidate with Sellers Capital in control of the company.  if they succeed though this thing could be a 5-bagger.  i really like managements tone in their latest conference call, they are telling it exactly like it is, not that good.  priority 1 was stop cash burn, and they did that in Q1.  i think they have a decent shot at turning it around (30-50% i my best guess) and the risk:reward is good.  be careful though you could lose all your money, even though their titanic assets were appraised at 46m (the ones they own free and clear, there are others currently in a legal battle) who knows how liquid that market is or how much they&#8217;d really get.  if they ended up only going for 20m that&#8217;d be fine too the market cap of the company is only 20m itself.  </p>
<p>the wild card here is 50% dilution is coming through a debt deal with Sellers that is kind of a necessary evil.  also their legal battle over what their status is regarding the titanic wreck is still looming over the company, a bad result there wouldn&#8217;t be that big a deal (so far the result was kinda bad but i think it&#8217;s on appeal i&#8217;m not quite sure) as they still have the artifacts i mentioned before, a good result there would be very beneficial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/comment-page-1/#comment-2798</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1927#comment-2798</guid>
		<description>ACLS PRXI

I know Jim has written a very extensive post on ACLS on his blog http://valueinvestortoday.com/

First time Im hearing about PRXI. Museum exhibitions... interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACLS PRXI</p>
<p>I know Jim has written a very extensive post on ACLS on his blog <a href="http://valueinvestortoday.com/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/valueinvestortoday.com/?referer=');">http://valueinvestortoday.com/</a></p>
<p>First time Im hearing about PRXI. Museum exhibitions&#8230; interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/comment-page-1/#comment-2797</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1927#comment-2797</guid>
		<description>OK, last post......

I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a puff left here though is the thing.  How much is a company worth that never makes any money?  Management here is greedy and incompetent and there are no activists here to fix it.  IMO it&#039;s basically fairly valued given the circumstances.

I love net-nets and cigar butts are great, I just think this is not a good one to concentrate in.  2 that I prefer right now are ACLS and PRXI.  Your blog is solid, I like MHH and I liked VVTV so ty for that $ in my pocket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, last post&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a puff left here though is the thing.  How much is a company worth that never makes any money?  Management here is greedy and incompetent and there are no activists here to fix it.  IMO it&#8217;s basically fairly valued given the circumstances.</p>
<p>I love net-nets and cigar butts are great, I just think this is not a good one to concentrate in.  2 that I prefer right now are ACLS and PRXI.  Your blog is solid, I like MHH and I liked VVTV so ty for that $ in my pocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/comment-page-1/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1927#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@ TJ,&lt;/strong&gt;

Personally, it isn&#039;t just about a company having to make money. I don&#039;t mind buying mediocre companies because I never intend to hold them for a long time.
It&#039;s Graham&#039;s cigar butt investing that I partake in when looking at deep value stocks. For a company like IGOI, where as you mentioned correctly, it may not do anything, the market will still have to realize that the value assigned to the company has been incorrect.

Currently my exit price is at close to $1. Although, if they can somehow pull a rabbit out of the hat, I&#039;ll be glad and lucky to enjoy the ride.

A horrific company needs an activist to push it to liquidation levels, but a so-so company should at least be able to reach the bottom level with market fluctuations.
As a value investor, I found a 50c dollar under some ugly looking rocks and I&#039;m just holding it until someone realises that it is a $1.
I dont need somebody to try to unlock the potential of $1 to make it to $5 or so.

But looking at how IGOI is handling things, my opinion is that it will be able to reach the $1 mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@ TJ,</strong></p>
<p>Personally, it isn&#8217;t just about a company having to make money. I don&#8217;t mind buying mediocre companies because I never intend to hold them for a long time.<br />
It&#8217;s Graham&#8217;s cigar butt investing that I partake in when looking at deep value stocks. For a company like IGOI, where as you mentioned correctly, it may not do anything, the market will still have to realize that the value assigned to the company has been incorrect.</p>
<p>Currently my exit price is at close to $1. Although, if they can somehow pull a rabbit out of the hat, I&#8217;ll be glad and lucky to enjoy the ride.</p>
<p>A horrific company needs an activist to push it to liquidation levels, but a so-so company should at least be able to reach the bottom level with market fluctuations.<br />
As a value investor, I found a 50c dollar under some ugly looking rocks and I&#8217;m just holding it until someone realises that it is a $1.<br />
I dont need somebody to try to unlock the potential of $1 to make it to $5 or so.</p>
<p>But looking at how IGOI is handling things, my opinion is that it will be able to reach the $1 mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/graham-net-net-stock-igoi/comment-page-1/#comment-2794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=1927#comment-2794</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@ Vik Murphy,&lt;/strong&gt;

Great questions you bring up.

1. The values on the spreadsheet are automatically retrieved from Yahoo. As per your observations, diluted number would be much better.

2. The &quot;generating cash statement&quot; was based on the positive Cash from operations and FCF from 2008. As for their $1.3 burn from Q1, it is negative compared to their previous years but I&#039;ll have to see a couple more quarters to see what the numbers indicate in order to form a better opinion. In a heavy recession such as now, even the best companies have burned through cash.
However, IGOI balance sheet is strong and the $1.3m is only a small fraction.

3. I consider 5% to be to be within my safety guidelines. Anything above 5% and its a warning sign for me. But why has it increased 5%, without the financial statements I cant give a clear answer and I&#039;ll also have to dive back into the DEF 14A in order to view their options.

If the dilution continues on at 5% over the next couple of quarters, watch out, management may be overconfident that that they can deliver higher returns than the dilution factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@ Vik Murphy,</strong></p>
<p>Great questions you bring up.</p>
<p>1. The values on the spreadsheet are automatically retrieved from Yahoo. As per your observations, diluted number would be much better.</p>
<p>2. The &#8220;generating cash statement&#8221; was based on the positive Cash from operations and FCF from 2008. As for their $1.3 burn from Q1, it is negative compared to their previous years but I&#8217;ll have to see a couple more quarters to see what the numbers indicate in order to form a better opinion. In a heavy recession such as now, even the best companies have burned through cash.<br />
However, IGOI balance sheet is strong and the $1.3m is only a small fraction.</p>
<p>3. I consider 5% to be to be within my safety guidelines. Anything above 5% and its a warning sign for me. But why has it increased 5%, without the financial statements I cant give a clear answer and I&#8217;ll also have to dive back into the DEF 14A in order to view their options.</p>
<p>If the dilution continues on at 5% over the next couple of quarters, watch out, management may be overconfident that that they can deliver higher returns than the dilution factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
