<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Under the Radar Developments at INSM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/insm-stock-news-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/insm-stock-news-development/?source=rss</link>
	<description>Perform Stock Valuation Automatically</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:05:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/insm-stock-news-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4652</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-4652</guid>
		<description>I fully expect INSM to run some more. There still have been no press release, it was a sub $1 stock until a couple of days ago which restricts most institutions from buying. Even though INSM is just above NNWC, you are still getting their IPLEX drug and any future prospect for free.

INSM has a floor of around $0.85 and intrinsic value of at least $2.50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully expect INSM to run some more. There still have been no press release, it was a sub $1 stock until a couple of days ago which restricts most institutions from buying. Even though INSM is just above NNWC, you are still getting their IPLEX drug and any future prospect for free.</p>
<p>INSM has a floor of around $0.85 and intrinsic value of at least $2.50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/insm-stock-news-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4650</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-4650</guid>
		<description>What do you think the risk/reward outlook is from here now that INSM is no longer NNWC? I&#039;d like to believe that the cash per share is the downside and with plenty of good news and potential value-unlocking scenarios in the works, INSM could run some more...I&#039;m sure the next few weeks will be very volatile with the upcoming deadlines and I&#039;d like to initiate a position but it&#039;s so hard to determine what is actual news and what is just noise and rumors driving the price around. I must say I know nottthinngg about biotechs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think the risk/reward outlook is from here now that INSM is no longer NNWC? I&#8217;d like to believe that the cash per share is the downside and with plenty of good news and potential value-unlocking scenarios in the works, INSM could run some more&#8230;I&#8217;m sure the next few weeks will be very volatile with the upcoming deadlines and I&#8217;d like to initiate a position but it&#8217;s so hard to determine what is actual news and what is just noise and rumors driving the price around. I must say I know nottthinngg about biotechs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/insm-stock-news-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-4545</guid>
		<description>Wow. Can&#039;t complain on a day like this, but just good luck and sitting tight while weak hands threw away their cards.
INSM test results were positive but there hasn&#039;t been any PR on it. Only a few biotech institutions seem to know about it. I put another order in but don&#039;t want to chase at the moment, as my allocation was filled until the test results came out. I did learn again that even NNWC biotechs with promise are awesome opportunities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Can&#8217;t complain on a day like this, but just good luck and sitting tight while weak hands threw away their cards.<br />
INSM test results were positive but there hasn&#8217;t been any PR on it. Only a few biotech institutions seem to know about it. I put another order in but don&#8217;t want to chase at the moment, as my allocation was filled until the test results came out. I did learn again that even NNWC biotechs with promise are awesome opportunities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/insm-stock-news-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4541</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-4541</guid>
		<description>Wow, look at that pop on some good news just as I fired up the computer to grab a few hundred shares... way to go Jae you have a nice jump on GGWPQ today too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, look at that pop on some good news just as I fired up the computer to grab a few hundred shares&#8230; way to go Jae you have a nice jump on GGWPQ today too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/insm-stock-news-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@ Derek,&lt;/strong&gt;
huh??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@ Derek,</strong><br />
huh??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek James</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/insm-stock-news-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-4381</guid>
		<description>blatant plagiarism.
are you one-and-the-same site? different URLs or something.
hope your (paid) advertisers know this (time waster)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blatant plagiarism.<br />
are you one-and-the-same site? different URLs or something.<br />
hope your (paid) advertisers know this (time waster)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Metheny</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/insm-stock-news-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4328</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Metheny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-4328</guid>
		<description>http://www.gurufocus.com/grahamncav.php

Why doesn&#039;t INSM show up on this list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/grahamncav.php" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.gurufocus.com/grahamncav.php?referer=');">http://www.gurufocus.com/grahamncav.php</a></p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t INSM show up on this list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 454/457 objects using eaccelerator
Content Delivery Network via Cdn.oldschoolvalue.com

Served from: www.oldschoolvalue.com @ 2012-02-11 21:51:22 -->
