<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quality Systems Inc (QSII) is a Quality Company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/quality-systems-inc-qsii-is-a-quality-company/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/quality-systems-inc-qsii-is-a-quality-company/?source=rss</link>
	<description>Excel DCF Stock Valuation Spreadsheet and Calculator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: 2009 Forbes Best Small Companies Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/quality-systems-inc-qsii-is-a-quality-company/comment-page-1/#comment-3656</link>
		<dc:creator>2009 Forbes Best Small Companies Part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=850#comment-3656</guid>
		<description>[...] previous analysis of QSII showed how much I was wrong. My intrinsic value estimate was between $22-$36 while it is now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #d9f9ff !important;<br />
color: #d9f9ff;">
<p>[...] previous analysis of QSII showed how much I was wrong. My intrinsic value estimate was between $22-$36 while it is now [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/quality-systems-inc-qsii-is-a-quality-company/comment-page-1/#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=850#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t listened to the conference calls but from QSII&#039;s history, I wouldn&#039;t be shorting it anytime soon. Unless there is a BIG red flag I feel the company is still too superior to short. I&#039;d rather leave it alone. The danger of manipulative management is that they can change many factors to benefit themselves leaving shorts in the dust since Wall Street would lap it all up as positive news.

I&#039;ll look into the other reasons for why The Skew is shorting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t listened to the conference calls but from QSII&#8217;s history, I wouldn&#8217;t be shorting it anytime soon. Unless there is a BIG red flag I feel the company is still too superior to short. I&#8217;d rather leave it alone. The danger of manipulative management is that they can change many factors to benefit themselves leaving shorts in the dust since Wall Street would lap it all up as positive news.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll look into the other reasons for why The Skew is shorting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlanMaestro</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/quality-systems-inc-qsii-is-a-quality-company/comment-page-1/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>PlanMaestro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=850#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>Yes, in an accounting way. The Skew has been short for a while. I have not checked his position, because I also thought that QSII was not really cheap and there are many options now.

http://theskew.blogspot.com/2008/06/quality-systems-qsii-earnings-lacking.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, in an accounting way. The Skew has been short for a while. I have not checked his position, because I also thought that QSII was not really cheap and there are many options now.</p>
<p><a href="http://theskew.blogspot.com/2008/06/quality-systems-qsii-earnings-lacking.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/theskew.blogspot.com/2008/06/quality-systems-qsii-earnings-lacking.html?referer=');">http://theskew.blogspot.com/2008/06/quality-systems-qsii-earnings-lacking.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/quality-systems-inc-qsii-is-a-quality-company/comment-page-1/#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=850#comment-1793</guid>
		<description>In an accounting way? I haven&#039;t really heard much about it. What did you hear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an accounting way? I haven&#8217;t really heard much about it. What did you hear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlanMaestro</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/quality-systems-inc-qsii-is-a-quality-company/comment-page-1/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>PlanMaestro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/?p=850#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>I passed on QSII because I heard about revenue recognition issues. Have you heard anything about that?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I passed on QSII because I heard about revenue recognition issues. Have you heard anything about that?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
