<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ValueVision Inc (VVTV) Q3 Updated Business Valuation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/?source=rss</link>
	<description>Perform Stock Valuation Automatically</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:05:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>ShopNBC Strategic Alternatives Review Process and Preliminary Fiscal Fourth Quarter 2008 Results Conference Call Notice

http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/090120/0467112.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ShopNBC Strategic Alternatives Review Process and Preliminary Fiscal Fourth Quarter 2008 Results Conference Call Notice</p>
<p><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/090120/0467112.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/biz.yahoo.com/iw/090120/0467112.html?referer=');">http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/090120/0467112.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>oh sorry. I meant the downside of the business and uncertain future (including obligations).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh sorry. I meant the downside of the business and uncertain future (including obligations).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Sorry for my ignorance Jae. What is well priced in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for my ignorance Jae. What is well priced in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info. I read through it and still think that given the current price, it is well priced in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info. I read through it and still think that given the current price, it is well priced in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>Here is one I just found that I believe is very relevant to VVTV&#039;s situation because its recent (2006 - 2007) and it is a transponder agreement from a competitor of theirs; JTV which can be found on channel 313 on Direct TV &amp; Channels 86 &amp; 227 on Dish Network. 

&quot;Termination Options: Either party may terminate this agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party.&quot;

http://www.cocolatv.com/Public_Files/KGMC43/Public%20File%2003.08/Affiliation%20Agreements/KGMC%20Affiliate%20Air%20Time%20Agreement-America%27s%20Collectibles%20Network%202006%2006.28.06.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is one I just found that I believe is very relevant to VVTV&#8217;s situation because its recent (2006 &#8211; 2007) and it is a transponder agreement from a competitor of theirs; JTV which can be found on channel 313 on Direct TV &amp; Channels 86 &amp; 227 on Dish Network. </p>
<p>&#8220;Termination Options: Either party may terminate this agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cocolatv.com/Public_Files/KGMC43/Public%20File%2003.08/Affiliation%20Agreements/KGMC%20Affiliate%20Air%20Time%20Agreement-America%27s%20Collectibles%20Network%202006%2006.28.06.pdf" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.cocolatv.com/Public_Files/KGMC43/Public_20File_2003.08/Affiliation_20Agreements/KGMC_20Affiliate_20Air_20Time_20Agreement-America_27s_20Collectibles_20Network_202006_2006.28.06.pdf?referer=');">http://www.cocolatv.com/Public_Files/KGMC43/Public%20File%2003.08/Affiliation%20Agreements/KGMC%20Affiliate%20Air%20Time%20Agreement-America%27s%20Collectibles%20Network%202006%2006.28.06.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m running into more and more transponder agreements online. Although they don&#039;t lend any certainties regarding VVTV&#039;s obligations which are transponder agreements, they do fuel my optimism that although being off balance obligations they may not be a liability that will affect shareholder value if a liquidation occurs. I&#039;ll post more of these agreements if you like but here is one that I discovered this evening.

http://www.information.tv/PTATCs/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running into more and more transponder agreements online. Although they don&#8217;t lend any certainties regarding VVTV&#8217;s obligations which are transponder agreements, they do fuel my optimism that although being off balance obligations they may not be a liability that will affect shareholder value if a liquidation occurs. I&#8217;ll post more of these agreements if you like but here is one that I discovered this evening.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.information.tv/PTATCs/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.information.tv/PTATCs/?referer=');">http://www.information.tv/PTATCs/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough, according to guru focus George Soros had a small position for a couple of months this year that he eventually sold out of.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ken’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://compoundinglife.com/?p=34&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PSD: Dividend announced&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough, according to guru focus George Soros had a small position for a couple of months this year that he eventually sold out of.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Ken’s last blog post..<a href="http://compoundinglife.com/?p=34" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/compoundinglife.com/?p=34&amp;referer=');">PSD: Dividend announced</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>Although he doesn&#039;t hold as large a position as Cannell, the renowned value investor Michael Price also holds a position. I&#039;m a big fan of Mr. Price and his position holds allot of fundamental merit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although he doesn&#8217;t hold as large a position as Cannell, the renowned value investor Michael Price also holds a position. I&#8217;m a big fan of Mr. Price and his position holds allot of fundamental merit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>Update on my thoughts.

I&#039;ll be sticking with VVTV and see what they say in Feb 09 regarding their strategic decision.
The notes regarding the obligation isn&#039;t what I was expecting BUT it is important to note that this is not the first time either. This is part of the business and the industry it is in.

Hope Cannell pushes harder to liquidate or sell itself. Cannell still holds a position so we have one activist doing the work for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update on my thoughts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be sticking with VVTV and see what they say in Feb 09 regarding their strategic decision.<br />
The notes regarding the obligation isn&#8217;t what I was expecting BUT it is important to note that this is not the first time either. This is part of the business and the industry it is in.</p>
<p>Hope Cannell pushes harder to liquidate or sell itself. Cannell still holds a position so we have one activist doing the work for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for your input JB.
I will definitely think about what you said and re-evaluate my position.

I too was thinking that even though the license and buildings all have value to them, they don&#039;t provide the company with liquidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for your input JB.<br />
I will definitely think about what you said and re-evaluate my position.</p>
<p>I too was thinking that even though the license and buildings all have value to them, they don&#8217;t provide the company with liquidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Note that the termination of lease option appears to be for the benefit of the non-liquidating/non-bankrupt party.  I.E., if a company goes bankrupt and cannot pay its commitments, the party who is owed can terminate the agreement rather than let it be transferred or retained as a right by the bankruptcy estate. If it were not terminated, it would be an executory contract in bankruptcy that could be accepted or rejected by the estate, and if rejected there would be a senior unsecured liability for some portion of the value (maybe a third? I&#039;m out of date on bankruptcy law) that would come before the preferred.

Note also that book value of an FCC license or a TV station may have little to do with realizable value in this economy.  Ad-based media are being pummeled by declining results and multiples on these companies are way down because investors fear a secular change (to the Net) rather than a cyclical decline.  If you want to dig down for value, spend some time on how that TV station/license value was booked and whether reality is more or less than that number (if the BV is old the real value might be higher).

Building value in Minnesota is also likely less than would be hoped, these days.

As for net working capital, it all revolves around the cash burn rate, and 3Q numbers look like the start of a trend.  They will have to be very sharp working capital managers to avoid a cash crunch in this environment.  

The company needs to get a major liquidity cushion to be assured of avoiding bankruptcy given its current numbers.  No buyer looking at what is happening operationally would want to provide that cushion, IMO.  The value here, if it exists, is solely from the expiration of carriage contracts and the potential for the station/license/studios to be worth something to someone who thinks it can be done better.  Note that when the carriage contracts end and if they are negotiated to much lower costs, the dial position is likely to move from low (it&#039;s channel 8 on my system) to high (JTV is 183 on my system; QVC might be in the 60s).  Higher dial position means fewer chance eyeballs and probably lower sales, so don&#039;t extrapolate profitability to the carriage contract in a linear fashion.

To me, this is all about the deal - an investment banking end-game.  If the hard assets have enough value in liquidation to give upside to the common then they have enough value out of liquidation and a sale will occur.  If it comes down to working capital liquidation, I would bet the preferred holder would work to pay that off and not care so much about the common. All speculation, of course.  So, focus on the major assets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that the termination of lease option appears to be for the benefit of the non-liquidating/non-bankrupt party.  I.E., if a company goes bankrupt and cannot pay its commitments, the party who is owed can terminate the agreement rather than let it be transferred or retained as a right by the bankruptcy estate. If it were not terminated, it would be an executory contract in bankruptcy that could be accepted or rejected by the estate, and if rejected there would be a senior unsecured liability for some portion of the value (maybe a third? I&#8217;m out of date on bankruptcy law) that would come before the preferred.</p>
<p>Note also that book value of an FCC license or a TV station may have little to do with realizable value in this economy.  Ad-based media are being pummeled by declining results and multiples on these companies are way down because investors fear a secular change (to the Net) rather than a cyclical decline.  If you want to dig down for value, spend some time on how that TV station/license value was booked and whether reality is more or less than that number (if the BV is old the real value might be higher).</p>
<p>Building value in Minnesota is also likely less than would be hoped, these days.</p>
<p>As for net working capital, it all revolves around the cash burn rate, and 3Q numbers look like the start of a trend.  They will have to be very sharp working capital managers to avoid a cash crunch in this environment.  </p>
<p>The company needs to get a major liquidity cushion to be assured of avoiding bankruptcy given its current numbers.  No buyer looking at what is happening operationally would want to provide that cushion, IMO.  The value here, if it exists, is solely from the expiration of carriage contracts and the potential for the station/license/studios to be worth something to someone who thinks it can be done better.  Note that when the carriage contracts end and if they are negotiated to much lower costs, the dial position is likely to move from low (it&#8217;s channel 8 on my system) to high (JTV is 183 on my system; QVC might be in the 60s).  Higher dial position means fewer chance eyeballs and probably lower sales, so don&#8217;t extrapolate profitability to the carriage contract in a linear fashion.</p>
<p>To me, this is all about the deal &#8211; an investment banking end-game.  If the hard assets have enough value in liquidation to give upside to the common then they have enough value out of liquidation and a sale will occur.  If it comes down to working capital liquidation, I would bet the preferred holder would work to pay that off and not care so much about the common. All speculation, of course.  So, focus on the major assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info and update Jim.

I&#039;ve been reading the past quarterly reports and now up to the 2007 10-K.

Do you have links to the Satellite transponder agreements you&#039;ve read? I&#039;ve never heard of such agreements and want to know. I&#039;ve searched and read a few but was wondering which ones you&#039;ve read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info and update Jim.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading the past quarterly reports and now up to the 2007 10-K.</p>
<p>Do you have links to the Satellite transponder agreements you&#8217;ve read? I&#8217;ve never heard of such agreements and want to know. I&#8217;ve searched and read a few but was wondering which ones you&#8217;ve read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>Jae, I&#039;m reading the fiscal 2007 10K right now. It seems to me that these agreements are mainly with NBC and that they can be transferred to a new owner of the business. I&#039;ve also read many transponder agreements between cable companies and businesses who have included the option that would let a company dissolve an agreement if they were to go into liquidation. Although there is a higher probability now of speculation because the complete details of these transponder agreements haven&#039;t been released from the company I think their are many relevant questions one has to ask in this situation to feel comfortable with the investment. Unfortunately, many of those questions are speculative.

1) Why hasn&#039;t the details of the agreements been released? A: I believe if everyone knew how good of an opportunity this were, shareholder interest would dilute the final outcome.

2) According to many Satellite transponder agreements I&#039;ve looked up as far back as 1997, a clause in each of them has allowed the company to dissolve the agreement if they were to go into liquidation or bankruptcy.

3) The agreement that is in effect with NBC concerning Trademarks is transferable and can be sold by VVTV (according to the fiscal 2007 10K).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jae, I&#8217;m reading the fiscal 2007 10K right now. It seems to me that these agreements are mainly with NBC and that they can be transferred to a new owner of the business. I&#8217;ve also read many transponder agreements between cable companies and businesses who have included the option that would let a company dissolve an agreement if they were to go into liquidation. Although there is a higher probability now of speculation because the complete details of these transponder agreements haven&#8217;t been released from the company I think their are many relevant questions one has to ask in this situation to feel comfortable with the investment. Unfortunately, many of those questions are speculative.</p>
<p>1) Why hasn&#8217;t the details of the agreements been released? A: I believe if everyone knew how good of an opportunity this were, shareholder interest would dilute the final outcome.</p>
<p>2) According to many Satellite transponder agreements I&#8217;ve looked up as far back as 1997, a clause in each of them has allowed the company to dissolve the agreement if they were to go into liquidation or bankruptcy.</p>
<p>3) The agreement that is in effect with NBC concerning Trademarks is transferable and can be sold by VVTV (according to the fiscal 2007 10K).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>An update from Greenbackd regarding the off balance sheet liabilities that showed up in the Q3 report of VVTV that can add up to 185 million in debt.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://greenbackd.com/2008/12/22/vvtv-quarantined-until-further-notice/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Update by Greenbackd&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update from Greenbackd regarding the off balance sheet liabilities that showed up in the Q3 report of VVTV that can add up to 185 million in debt.</p>
<p><a href="http://greenbackd.com/2008/12/22/vvtv-quarantined-until-further-notice/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/greenbackd.com/2008/12/22/vvtv-quarantined-until-further-notice/?referer=');">Update by Greenbackd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>Over 1 year ago I first noticed TUES but I never bothered looking deeper into TUES because I didn&#039;t like the business. I&#039;ve shopped there and I know a friend who has a friend working at TUES and the stories dont impress me.

But now that I&#039;ve been looking into more net nets, I realise I should be looking at TUES from a different angle rather than a simple long.

Regarding VVTV, we&#039;ll see whether the board decides to announce a sale on Feb 2, 2009. But there has to be some serious buying before it goes up but then again, we have time to help us out.

I havent seen CHRS before. Thanks for the tip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 1 year ago I first noticed TUES but I never bothered looking deeper into TUES because I didn&#8217;t like the business. I&#8217;ve shopped there and I know a friend who has a friend working at TUES and the stories dont impress me.</p>
<p>But now that I&#8217;ve been looking into more net nets, I realise I should be looking at TUES from a different angle rather than a simple long.</p>
<p>Regarding VVTV, we&#8217;ll see whether the board decides to announce a sale on Feb 2, 2009. But there has to be some serious buying before it goes up but then again, we have time to help us out.</p>
<p>I havent seen CHRS before. Thanks for the tip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 04:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got HSNI on my watchlist to. check out GVHR

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mark’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/stockpursuit/VhAe/~3/488242442/net-net-tuesday-morning-corp-tues-in.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Net-Net Tuesday Morning Corp. (TUES) In Play&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got HSNI on my watchlist to. check out GVHR</p>
<p><abbr><em>Mark’s last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/stockpursuit/VhAe/~3/488242442/net-net-tuesday-morning-corp-tues-in.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/feeds.feedburner.com/_r/stockpursuit/VhAe/_3/488242442/net-net-tuesday-morning-corp-tues-in.html?referer=');">Net-Net Tuesday Morning Corp. (TUES) In Play</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>If your looking for longs in cheap stocks like VVTV I recommend the ones that are in play. Check out CHRS, TUES on pull-backs,maybe SRZ stock like VVTV aren&#039;t going up anyway unless institutions start to buy them no matter how cheap it is

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mark’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/stockpursuit/VhAe/~3/488242442/net-net-tuesday-morning-corp-tues-in.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Net-Net Tuesday Morning Corp. (TUES) In Play&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your looking for longs in cheap stocks like VVTV I recommend the ones that are in play. Check out CHRS, TUES on pull-backs,maybe SRZ stock like VVTV aren&#8217;t going up anyway unless institutions start to buy them no matter how cheap it is</p>
<p><abbr><em>Mark’s last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/stockpursuit/VhAe/~3/488242442/net-net-tuesday-morning-corp-tues-in.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/feeds.feedburner.com/_r/stockpursuit/VhAe/_3/488242442/net-net-tuesday-morning-corp-tues-in.html?referer=');">Net-Net Tuesday Morning Corp. (TUES) In Play</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>Another good post on VVTV with similar results to mine.

One important thing to note is the comment regarding a huge operating lease.

Did I make a mistake? Operating leases are considered off balance sheet debt.

Read it for yourself. http://greenbackd.com/2008/12/17/valuevision-media-inc-nasdaqvvtv-q3/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good post on VVTV with similar results to mine.</p>
<p>One important thing to note is the comment regarding a huge operating lease.</p>
<p>Did I make a mistake? Operating leases are considered off balance sheet debt.</p>
<p>Read it for yourself. <a href="http://greenbackd.com/2008/12/17/valuevision-media-inc-nasdaqvvtv-q3/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/greenbackd.com/2008/12/17/valuevision-media-inc-nasdaqvvtv-q3/?referer=');">http://greenbackd.com/2008/12/17/valuevision-media-inc-nasdaqvvtv-q3/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t dissected HSNI but just took a quick glance at the numbers and it certainly isn&#039;t a business I&#039;d entertain any further valuation on. I sent you an email today, check it out. Have a great weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t dissected HSNI but just took a quick glance at the numbers and it certainly isn&#8217;t a business I&#8217;d entertain any further valuation on. I sent you an email today, check it out. Have a great weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/stock-analysis/valuevision-inc-q3-updated-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=277#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>Yes there is a risk associated with HSNI and other network companies, including VVTV, but I think it looks worse because of the spin-off. Not saying that I will make it 20% of my portfolio even at a cheap price so all about asset management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes there is a risk associated with HSNI and other network companies, including VVTV, but I think it looks worse because of the spin-off. Not saying that I will make it 20% of my portfolio even at a cheap price so all about asset management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 716/722 objects using eaccelerator
Content Delivery Network via Cdn.oldschoolvalue.com

Served from: www.oldschoolvalue.com @ 2012-02-12 06:22:38 -->
