Posts Tagged ‘buffett’

Learn how to invest, read stock analysis, and find stock picks

Wrigley’s, Mars and Buffett

The major news today is of Mars Inc buying Wrigley’s for $23 billion. A 28% premium over Friday’s close. Wrigley’s basically owns the chewing gum market with 50% market share in the US as well as a strong presence internationally. Because of its gigantic moat and simple to understand business, it has been one of Buffett’s often used examples in speeches. No wonder he doesn’t mind putting up $6.3 billion in cash to help finance the deal for a minor stake in the company.

When Opportunities Arise

In a phone call with CNBC, Buffett explains his reason for helping finance the deal in current volatile times.

a good time to buy a really great business is when you can do it – Warren Buffett

What do I like about this answer? It’s just a simple, straight forward, common sense answer. He doesn’t quote the high or low price, the PE or anything regarding valuation. Watch the Wall Street analysts talk about the deal and they will start getting into arguments with one another over why the price is as it is, what’s going to happen to the other companies, who is going to get what etc etc. They start introducing so much noise into the conversation that the whole essence of “paying a fair price for a great company” is gone.

Price Check on Wrigley’s

Previously when I started listening to Buffett’s speeches and heard him talk about Wrigley’s I did a valuation and found it to be fairly priced so I didn’t bother investing in the company. Although Wrigley’s has got to be one of the most boring, stable, consistent performers, I was too cheap and walked by. I wanted excitement…

For the past 10 years, Wrigley’s FCF has grown at a rate of 14.4%. Like all companies, we’ll have to make assumptions of the future. With a sensible discount rate of 9% and keeping the growth rate as 14.4% slowed down to 5% after 10 years, the intrinsic value of Wrigley’s comes out to $69.07. Graham tells me he also agrees with an intrinsic value of $69.85. Friday’s closing price was around $62. That’s an error margin of approx 12%.
I just love predictable companies don’t you? =)

Historical Price Check on Wrigley’s

As you can see, Wrigley’s has traded at a fair price compared to its intrinsic value. Perhaps the only real opportunity would have been to buy in mid 2006, but even then, it was never a deep discount.


However, this is a prime example of a Buffett type investment. A business that is simple to understand with a huge moat that he could hold onto forever without worrying about day to day operations.

Congrats to Wrigley longs.

Post featured on 87th Festival of stocks at Finance Viewpoint.

Buffett’s 2007 Annual Letter

Berkshire Hathaway’s 2007 letter has been out for a couple of weeks and I finally got around to reading it. As usual, it is a highly educational read, detailing Berkshire’s business performance as well as the wit and wisdom of Warren Buffett. Continue on to read a list of quotes that I believe to be insightful and invaluable as well as commentaries.

Buffett the Whale

First of all, Buffett is in a completely different investing league as us. He’s cash pile of $44 Billion doesn’t compare to the thousand dollars of most investors including myself. Buffet himself has said that if he had to invest $10,000 he would literally be looking at thousands of opportunities, but his $44 billion budget only allows him to go after the huge, giant fish in order to see any benefit.

If Buffett was a fish, he would be a Blue Whale. Nibbling on shrimp, seahorse and the occasional salmon won’t fill its appetite. A whale has to eat something like the giant squid or another fellow whale to be satisfied. I’m assuming you and I are like the salmon or the piranha. Hungry and searching for growth.

This bring us to a key concept. We greatly benefit from his teachings but we do not need to apply 100% of what he says into our investing methods. What works with $44 billion may not be the best choice for $10,000. The purpose at Old School is to learn and adapt from the masters, not to be exactly like them.

2007 Quotes

Like most all of Buffett’s letters, he includes his thoughts on the types of businesses he looks for. 2007 re-iterates a lot of what he already has said but it’s always good to be reminded.

Charlie and I look for companies that have a) a business we understand; b) favorable long-term economics; c) able and trustworthy management; and d) a sensible price tag.

The dynamics of capitalism guarantee that competitors will repeatedly assault any business “castle” that is earning high returns.

U.S.A embracing capitalism has allowed companies to chase after other companies, breed competition and steal profits. If a company is yielding outstanding earnings with little competition, it won’t be long before a whole army of competitors will jump into the market, wanting a piece of the profit. Eventually, that profit will become smaller and smaller.

… causes us to rule out companies in industries prone to rapid and continuous change.

Buffett doesn’t invest in companies in fast changing innovative companies or industries. He is just playing to his strengths and circle of competence. Others understand tech and other growing industries. We should be playing to our strengths.

Don’t be playing in the Bronx without knowing what you’re doing.

A moat that must be continuously rebuilt will eventually be no moat at all.

Companies require some sort of competitive advantage in order to profit and stay profitable. What type of profits are we to expect if the company is no better than its neighbor?

..this criterion eliminates the business whose success depends on having a great manager…. if a business requires a superstar to produce great results, the business itself cannot be deemed great.

There are those that believe having a great CEO is a moat. That may be the case, but only when he is with the company. If she leaves, that moat leaves with her. I always emphasize the importance of great management, but never claim that having a great CEO is a moat. By management, we need to look at the entire executive team. If a vital person suddenly becomes ill or leaves, many able people must be there to lead the company. If Steve Jobs leaves Apple, I expect a majority of shareholders to leave with him.

Long-term competitive advantage in a stable industry is what we seek in a business. If that comes with rapid organic growth, great. But even without organic growth, such a business is rewarding.

Finding companies with competitive advantage is the key. Whether it be in growing companies or mature companies, if it can be bought at a discount, it will bring rewards.

The worst sort of business is one that grows rapidly, requires significant capital to engender the growth, and then earns little or no money. Think airlines.

I don’t go near airlines even with a 100 foot pole.

To sum up, think of three types of “savings accounts.” The great one pays an extraordinarily high interest rate that will rise as the years pass. The good one pays an attractive rate of interest that will be earned also on deposits that are added. Finally, the gruesome account both pays an inadequate interest rate and requires you to keep adding money at those disappointing returns.

A nice way of explaining the differences in return between a great, good and gruesome company.

Economic Thoughts

The 2007 letter also provides Buffett’s thoughts on the economy and the cause of the current economic situation. I don’t want to get into a economic thesis so I will leave it up to you to read the rest.

One thing I will add is that I don’t believe we are over this yet. Wall Street seems to think so with the huge 400point rallies but reality doesn’t seem so bright for the short term. Things need to get worked out which may take a while longer.

A page of links will lead you to Berkshire’s website or you can just go directly here.

Diversification: Old School Buffett Style

Do you diversify? Diversification must be one of money managements most important concept. When you speak to just a regular financial advisor they will probably mention that you haven’t diversified enough. Have you diversified lately?

Two Different Applications

The way Buffett sees it, diversification falls into two categories.
1. Diversification for the conservative, lazy investor
2. Diversification for the intelligent or enterprising investor

The Conservative/Lazy Investor

By definition, a conservative or lazy investor is a person who does not spend too much time studying or being involved with their investments. These people are happy to buy a fund or a stock and check up on it once or twice a year. Wall Street claim these people have ‘boring’ and ‘dull’ strategies. People in this group also prefer not to have realised or unrealised loss.

For this group, Buffett informs us that conservative investors should diversify extensively and keep trading to a minimum. Diversifying extensively simply means buying more stocks or mutual funds. Basically this is what a mutual fund or index fund does. This is a way of owning a tiny piece of America.

The Enterprising Investor

Proud to call yourself an enterprising investor? This is a term created by Benjamin Graham in The Intelligent Investor and refers to people that are keen, eager and willing to devote time in finding investment opportunities and analysing those opportunities.

Enterprising investors are confident in their research, analytical abilities and decision. For enterprisers, Buffett tells us that you should not diversify. Owning around 6 companies is all you need.

“Wide diversification is only required when investors do not understand what they are doing.”

Back to Sprint Training

Let me explain it in terms of baseball again. You step to the plate and the pitcher throws a dead straight fat yet slow fastball right through the middle.

Do you
a) let it go
b) bunt it and try to get to 1st base
c) flex your muscles, lick you lips, swing hard and try to hit it to the sun

People who chose a and b, don’t hesitate and just buy index funds. C choosers, you know pitches like this don’t come very often. If it does come, are you going to diversify by putting a small portion of the your capital into it and then go searching for 30 identical pitches just to reduce the chance of getting out?

The Key to Diversifying..

is to not diversify. If you are confident in your analysis, you tend not worry about price fluctuations. If it goes down, it is just a greater opportunity to buy more of a great business at a great price. Diversifying is for the conventional safety seekers and followers of Wall Street. Wall Street claims holding less stocks is risky, but the results of Buffett and the Super-Investors prove otherwise. At most times, more than 70% of Buffett’s capital was invested into 4-5 companies. He knew he could hit that fastball and did it. Are you scared to swing at your fastball?

“Diversification is a protection against ignorance. It makes very little sense for those who know what they’re doing.”

Buffett, Investing & Baseball

What do all these things have in common? Buffett and investing definitely go together, but how does baseball fit in? Buffett, a fan of baseball, regularly uses baseball analogies to compare his investment methods. In the investment world, where Mr Market is the pitcher, Buffett is one of the best batters in the world. As always, Buffett is kind enough to share his techniques and strategy to all those that listen. Marks of a truly great sportsman.

Player, Manager, Coach, Spectator

To a lot of people, especially to those starting out, investing is considered daunting, time intensive and difficult. True. Not everyone is capable of saying they were born with natural investing talent, and not everyone is capable of saying they were born to play baseball. Some are better at managing and some are better at coaching.

First you have to figure out what type of player you are. If you get giddy with losing even a couple of dollars, constantly fret over the market fluctuations or just blindly follow the herd, investing in index funds will do you more good. However, I think most of the people reading this would be players.

Slugger

Sluggers are great fun to watch. They bring in crowds, create noise in the stadium and they carry aura and a sense of expectation. When Barry Bonds steps to the plate or better yet Babe Ruth, people are expecting something. They are on the edges of their seats, eager to see the stitching, leather and core of the ball explode out of the park. These people are willing to pay a premium to see the action closer so that they can witness some exciting action. Now sluggers are huge crowd pleasers, but I believe they fail to create that return to the spectators more often than they do.

It seems to be the same with investors. Ever heard the phrase “I just need to find the next Microsoft or Google”? I too was subject to this type of thinking until Buffett kindly intervened.A majority of people look for and chase opportunities just because they think it has potential. All pitches have the potential to be a homer, but actually getting a homer off it is a different story. They get wrapped up in the emotion of being left behind and chase after opportunities even though the timing is completely off. They only see the glory at the end. What they end up doing is chasing the fast growth stocks even if the price is at a ridiculously high speculative level. Swinging hard at a curve ball aimed right at the corner of the strike zone wont bring many big returns.

Home Run Hero

I define slugger and home run hitters a bit differently. Sluggers will mostly swing at anything. Home run hitters wait patiently for the perfect fat pitch to swing at. To me Buffett is a Home Run Hero. Much like Babe Ruth.

Buffett told CNBC

“What’s nice about investing is you don’t have to swing at pitches. You can watch pitches come in one inch above or one inch below your navel and you don’t have to swing. No umpire is going to call you out. You can wait for the pitch you want.”

This quote reflects the style of Ted Williams, whom Buffett refers to quite frequently. The reason behind Williams success is that he had the discipline and patience to wait for the pitches that were exactly in his hitting zone. Williams divided his strike zone into 77 cells and swung at only the pitches that flew through his best hitting cells.

Buffett himself only waits for the “straight fat pitch”, and when he gets it, he bets big. Wall Street thinks otherwise. Their philosophy of diversifying, not betting too much on a single investment, is embedded in the minds of most investors. Buffett on the other hand bets big on the bets where he knows the odds are in his favour. If you bet 10 times at a casino table where the odds are 10-1 for you, obviously you will bet huge each time. The final result will have you as the winner at the end. You may lose once or twice due to bad luck, but overall you win handsomely and with little risk. This seems to be a concept people find hard to comprehend.

To be a great investor, one has to have conviction in his decision. Buffett has that characteristic and was able to bet 40% of his capital in his purchase of AMEX during the whole salad dressing debacle. However, a lot of people think that is risky and gambling. That is understandable. What Buffett does takes a lot of guts.

In the words of Charlie Munger

“I didn’t become a billionaire by chasing after mediocre opportunities.”

Single Hitter

But many investors don’t like to wait years on end just for that perfect pitch to come in. Many people succeed in the market by constantly hitting singles. By this, I don’t mean trading every day and gambling in order to achieve a few % points each day and then selling. What I mean by single hitting is going after the sure opportunities more frequently.

Buffett may only swing when the ball comes in his perfect home run cell, but there are many other cells where a single or double can be taken without any risk. Accumulating these singles wins the game. In the game of baseball, constant singles win the game, the division championship and the world series. A disciplined team seeks to maximise its singles. It is the singles which turn into runs and portfolio winners.

Taking singles also requires strict discipline. Take Ichiro as an example. His swing barely changes. He swings at balls he knows he can hit, all the while maintaining focus and discipline. As an investor, we must always work within our circle of competence and do it the right way over and over again. We don’t want our emotions or minds to become clouded.

Charlie Munger mentions that investors should be more like pilots; always checking their checklist prior to taking off.

All Star

Whether you are a home run hitter or single hitter, discipline is required in order to succeed. As long as you maintain discipline, go after the sure hits and don’t do a lot of things wrong, you will ultimately end up as an All-Star elite.