Posts Tagged ‘puget sound’

Learn how to invest, read stock analysis, and find stock picks

Puget Energy Merger Delayed

It has been announced that the PSD merger will not close by the end of the year. The merger agreement requires closing the deal 15 business days after all requirements have been met, including approval by the Utilities and Transportation Commission. Today being the 12th and not expecting an announcement this week, we run out of days in December for it to work out.

A New Question Regarding The Merger

On hearing the news, a slight concern related to financing came to my mind. What happens to the capital if the financing condition is based on a closure date of 2008. Would the money still be available in 2009?

After reviewing the Proxy statement, it does not reveal anything related to deadlines or timeframes for financing. I’ll consider this as the capital still being available in 2009.

Scanning through the proxy also served as a reminder to check on the banks (Barclays and Dresdner) providing the debt financing. (No comments on this yet.)

Going deeper into search led me to think about the ownership and how the Macquarie people were involved.

Ownership Interest

The latest 13D statement from Oct 2, 2008 shows the ownership of the Macquarie shareholders. Additionally, the notes bring up some interesting information, but first, the ownership is as follows:

  • Macquarie Infrastructure Partners A, L.P. – 1.3%
  • Macquarie Infrastructure Partners International, L.P – 1.4%
  • Macquarie Infrastructure Partners Canada, L.P. – 0.3%
  • Macquarie FSS Infrastructure Trust – 0.4%
  • Macquarie Asset Finance Limited – 1.5%

In total, Macquarie holds 4.9%. This is not a huge amount but it does show that the buyer is serious.

Regarding the notes, there is a section which states;

“On October 2, 2008, Padua MG Holdings (PMGH) transferred all of the shares of Common Stock that it held to Macquarie Asset Finance Limited (MAFL). As a result of the transfer, PMGH no longer holds any shares of Common Stock……

Macquarie Capital Group Limited (MCGL) is the operating company for Macquarie Group Limited (MGL) non-banking operations. MCGL often invests alongside Macquarie Group managed funds in investments similar to the acquisition of Puget in an underwriting capacity. This is the case for the Merger, and MCGL expects to sell down either the shares of PMGH or PMGH’s minority position to other Macquarie Group-managed funds prior to financial close of the Merger or shortly thereafter.”

It seems like the price drop starting Oct 2 may have been part of Macquarie’s process of acquiring shares from other holders. It’s also exactly at this time the market started going nuts. So all of this, being part of the process, was probably overshadowed by mad Mr Market. Talk about timing.

Odds of the Merger

Time for a numbers update. Here are the figures I am now applying considering all the information I’ve laid out here and in previous posts.

Upside Potential: 23%: $24.41 -> $30

Downside Potential: 20%: $24.41 -> $20

Probability of Success: 80% (probability decreased due to my financing worries)

Probability of Failure: 20%

Time Frame: 1 week,  >1week but <1 month,  1 month

It’s also important to note that the upside and downside percentages are inversely correlated. If the price goes up, the upside decreases and downside increases and vice versa.

Other Points

From my previous posts, it’s very clear that the Public Counsel is trying to delay the merger. As I don’t understand the way business works at the UTC I have no way of answering why they can’t just ignore the Public Counsel and get on with the job. Maybe it’s part of the Public Counsel’s job description to oppose everything. Who knows..? So from today on, I’ll probably deduct the influence the Public Counsel may have in preventing the merger.

A reader asked me what other situations I have been looking into. My arbitrage strategy is to focus on one at a time so that I have a understanding of the whole picture rather than knowing bits and pieces and filling in the blanks with my own assumptions. There is so much uncertainty to a deal that missing vital clues could be disastrous. This is a risk of why arbitrage isn’t for those that don’t have the time to try and find everything.

Disclosure

Long PSD at time of writing.

[tags]arbitrage, merger, psd, puget sound, Special Situations[/tags]

Community Against Puget Energy (PSD) Merger?

Before I begin, let me start by saying that if you are invested in this PSD arbitrage and feel uneasy about the press Puget Energy has been receiving, I encourage you to sell out. You’ll still end up with a profit now and more comfortable nights.

People’s Concerns Over a Local Movement

Over at Seeking Alpha where my post was published, people have been commenting on the local counties wanting to start up their own Public Utility District (PUD) which would provide service at a lower rate than to Puget Sound Energy. I replied to a comment regarding this on the previous post.

Press Related to the PUD

Here is an article from the Seattle Times endorsing the local Public Utility District (PUD) and another by Crosscut and one more from the Whidbey News Times.

These three articles all have one thing in common. They only talk about the possibility of the PUD and what it would bring. No mention of any protests against the merger. What these local people want is lower rates. I would assume most don’t even know the details of the buyout. Classic case of noise interference.

Digging Around

So instead of just sitting around, I did some more digging to see what I could come up with.

On May 6, a UTC press release stated the following

“The commission has received 1,513 public comments to date on the proposed merger – 20 in favor, 48 undecided and 1,445 opposed. The UTC also has received about 2,854 public comments on the rate-hike request – 27 in favor, 73 undecided and 2,754 opposed.”

On September 25, another press release announced the approval of the rate increase.

Then on October 8, it was annouced that electricity rates would decrease by 3% while natural gas bills would increase 5%. This press release also mentioned another opposition from the public.

“The commission received 6,686 public comments on the PSE proposed rate hike – 12 in favor, 6,552 opposed and 122 undecided.”

This brings me to an interesting and vital point. There were over 9000 people opposed to the rate increase compared to the 32 in favor. YET, the rate increase was approved. Why and how? Because it’s in line with market prices and PSD meets the required no-harm standard and PSD have assured the UTC that service will remain just as good. Even Northwest Natural’s gas increase of 19% was approved.

There is also a worry that the company is being bought by foreigners but it will remain locally governed, managed and run.

Concern at the Back of my Mind

The only concern I have is related to the board members of the UTC. The three members that make up the board are appointees of Gov. Christine Gregoire and because she is up for re-election, the board may make a decision to make her look good. If politics gets involved, who knows how this will turn out..

Up till now, this has been my interpretation, but I also want to hear it as it is so I’ve scheduled a call with PSD investor relations today. I’ll share it when I get the chance.

Disclosure: I own PSD at the time of this writing

[tags]PSD, UTC, PSE, merger, arbitrage, special situation, puget sound [/tags]