<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Value Stocks using DCF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/?source=rss</link>
	<description>Perform Stock Valuation Automatically</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/comment-page-1/#comment-8687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-8687</guid>
		<description>@ alexo,
If you go to the DCFdata tab (it&#039;s hidden by default) you will see the WACC calculation at the bottom of the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ alexo,<br />
If you go to the DCFdata tab (it&#8217;s hidden by default) you will see the WACC calculation at the bottom of the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexoviedo999</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/comment-page-1/#comment-8685</link>
		<dc:creator>alexoviedo999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 04:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-8685</guid>
		<description>Hello Jae,
Great website!!!  I agree with your views on WACC, however, I am a MBA student and some of my professors want to see WACC as part of the DCF valuation.  When using your DCF spreadsheet there is an option to use an already calculated WACC in the drop down discount menu, but I don&#039;t see how that number came about.  Can you point out how the spreadsheet comes up with the WACC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jae,<br />
Great website!!!  I agree with your views on WACC, however, I am a MBA student and some of my professors want to see WACC as part of the DCF valuation.  When using your DCF spreadsheet there is an option to use an already calculated WACC in the drop down discount menu, but I don&#8217;t see how that number came about.  Can you point out how the spreadsheet comes up with the WACC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/comment-page-1/#comment-8651</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-8651</guid>
		<description>The answer is very basic. How do you calculate FCF?
Even the basic formula of FCF (Cash from Operations - Capex) excludes dividend payouts. This is comparing apples to apples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is very basic. How do you calculate FCF?<br />
Even the basic formula of FCF (Cash from Operations &#8211; Capex) excludes dividend payouts. This is comparing apples to apples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/comment-page-1/#comment-8650</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-8650</guid>
		<description>I can see a few flaws with this method, firstly you are calculating the value of a stock of based on the company only staying afloat for N years, when in reality a companys earnings should be treated more like a perpetuity. Second as Tyler said if you apply a growth rate the way you have you will end up comparing apples with oranges. ie take for example two companies who are in the same business with exactly the same earnings but company A pays out a 50% dividend and company B pays no dividend. In this case company B will have much higher growth and therefore you would value the stock much higher, but the total return from the two companies (if you reinvest dividends at the same return)if you ignore tax will be identical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see a few flaws with this method, firstly you are calculating the value of a stock of based on the company only staying afloat for N years, when in reality a companys earnings should be treated more like a perpetuity. Second as Tyler said if you apply a growth rate the way you have you will end up comparing apples with oranges. ie take for example two companies who are in the same business with exactly the same earnings but company A pays out a 50% dividend and company B pays no dividend. In this case company B will have much higher growth and therefore you would value the stock much higher, but the total return from the two companies (if you reinvest dividends at the same return)if you ignore tax will be identical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/comment-page-1/#comment-3834</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-3834</guid>
		<description>ive been speaking to a value invester quite reknown here in australia this is what he had to say on DCF formula. ps im not saying hes correct just putting the opinion out there.

&quot;You are simply using a formula that only applies to companies with 100% pay out ratios.  The formula is slightly different for a company that retains and compounds earnings.  Risk free rates are useful in risk free environments.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ive been speaking to a value invester quite reknown here in australia this is what he had to say on DCF formula. ps im not saying hes correct just putting the opinion out there.</p>
<p>&#8220;You are simply using a formula that only applies to companies with 100% pay out ratios.  The formula is slightly different for a company that retains and compounds earnings.  Risk free rates are useful in risk free environments.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/comment-page-1/#comment-3821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-3821</guid>
		<description>Maybe this link will help
http://www.wallstraits.net/articles/1304</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this link will help<br />
<a href="http://www.wallstraits.net/articles/1304" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.wallstraits.net/articles/1304?referer=');">http://www.wallstraits.net/articles/1304</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/comment-page-1/#comment-3816</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-3816</guid>
		<description>Can you explain beta and WACC and why its not good. im quite new to this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you explain beta and WACC and why its not good. im quite new to this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Jun</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/comment-page-1/#comment-3810</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-3810</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t fall into the side that uses WACC because it relies too much on beta. And we all know how much fluff beta is made out of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t fall into the side that uses WACC because it relies too much on beta. And we all know how much fluff beta is made out of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/valuation-methods/how-value-stocks-dcf/comment-page-1/#comment-3805</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-3805</guid>
		<description>for discount rate should u use WACC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for discount rate should u use WACC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 495/501 objects using eaccelerator
Content Delivery Network via Cdn.oldschoolvalue.com

Served from: www.oldschoolvalue.com @ 2012-02-11 15:12:38 -->
