The Problem with the AAII Stock Screens

Written by

Jae Jun

follow me on



I get this question surprisingly often.

Why does your Piotroski Stock Screen underperform the AAII Piotroski Stock Screen?

To answer this question, first look at the awesome performance of AAII’s Piotroski screen.

2014 Q1 Performance is 17.8%!

2014 Q1 Performance is 17.8% with 32.1% Annualized Return

Before anything else, you can click on the image below to download a PDF version of this article. 


AAII’s Historial Performance


With this type of performance, why on earth would you even bother doing anything else?

Might as well sell everything you hold and just dump all your cash into whatever this screen tells you to buy right?


Because there is a huge fundamental flaw with this screen.

Let’s see if you can identify what it is.

"Hypothetical" Holdings and Extreme Concentration

AAII’s “Hypothetical” Holdings and Extreme Concentration

Yup. Just two companies.

Even with extreme conviction, I don’t put 50% into any one stock unless I had a $1,000 portfolio.

Over the past 3-4 years I’ve been comparing and tracking AAII’s Piotroski screener, there are many instances where the total number of holdings is less than 4.

You may be thinking that the backtest proves that despite the highly concentrated holdings, the results speak for themselves.

And from the theoretical backtest, it’s proven right.


What You Need to Know About Pre-Defined Screens

There are 2 main points you have to consider when following any screening strategy.

  • Turnover and transaction fees
  • Number of holdings

Turnover and Transaction Fees

AAII updates their screener every month and the performance is measured by whichever stock is passing at that particular point in time.

That means every month, you need to sell and buy.

The problem is that the screen doesn’t factor in the trading fees if there are lots of companies to buy/sell.

What’s more, you may be unable to buy a stock at the proper price if the volume is low.

This will obviously affect your total return.

Number of Holdings

I make sure each of my value screens are based on holding 20 stocks of equal weight. No position is to be more than 5% at the time of purchase.

If only 10 stocks show up on the screen, then only 50% of the portfolio is used. The remaining 50% remains in cash.

Compare that with AAII.

There are 2 passing companies at the moment. That means you have to hold 50% of your portfolio in each. If you have a $500k portfolio, are you willing to invest $250k into each small cap?

What happens if the results only list one stock?

Consider This if You Want to Use Quant Strategies

Make sure there is extensive research into the strategy as well as how the strategy is executed in detail.

Look for something like what I did with the Magic Formula. See how I wanted to see whether the Magic Formula worked or not.

Don’t get glossy eyed over the 9,000% return chart or the 32.1% annualized claim. If this was a real money portfolio, it would never be that high.

If something looks too good to be true, it is.

Never put more than 5% into each position from a screener because even as a basket, quant strategies fall the hardest when markets go bad. Even AAII’s Piotroski screener looks like it fell somewhere between 30-50% in 2011.

As for the AAII Piostroski Screen?

Don’t Fall for the Exponential Profit Chart

I really like AAII and what they do for investor education. I’m a member and also a subscriber to their stock research newsletter too, but their screens are best used as idea generators only.

What is Old School Value?

Old School Value is a suite of value investing tools designed to fatten your portfolio by identifying what stocks to buy and sell.

It is a stock grader, value screener, and valuation tools for the busy investor designed to help you pick stocks 4x faster.

Check out the live preview of AMZN, MSFT, BAC, AAPL and FB.

2 responses to “The Problem with the AAII Stock Screens”

  1. Great post!

    Yeah, I found a whole bunch of problems with stock screeners, as well, which is why I think investors should always be doing some research even if they adopt a purely mechanical strategy.

    I wrote about some of them here:


    Even some academic studies look at rebalancing monthly and only holding 1 or 2 stocks at times. Not viable.

    Luckily, the drawbacks of not putting your money into one or two situations balances out with holding cash since cash protects investors during market drops and is a huge advantage after the bottom has fallen out of the market.


  2. yea good point. Lots of little things to know about quant strategies that publishers don’t mention.

    I don’t see why any portfolio is rebalanced monthly unless it’s a trading strategy and not a fundamentals based one.

Pick Winning Stocks and Fatten Your Portfolio