What You’ll Learn
- Why this company is a discarded value
- Past performance and numbers
- Why I think this company is undervalued
Wesco Aircraft (WAIR) sparked my interest after ranking value attributes for a basket of over 3,000 companies. At first it was the large debt reduction since 2014. Then the aggressive and historical out sized insider buying over the past two months, mean reverting stock performance with a -44% 52-week price change near 52 week low.
Enterprise value decline of 50% from the first fiscal quarter ending March 2014 (3,190.560M) to 08/24/17 (1,605.856M).
Further, a renewed interest by patient value institutions reporting additional buying for the quarter reported 06/30/17. These and other attributes warranted a closer examination into Wesco Aircraft Holdings (WAIR).
Wesco Aircraft is one of the largest international distributor and provider of supply chain management services to the aerospace industry. The company offers aerospace products, including hardware, chemical, and electrical with over 565,000 active SKU. Founded in 1953 with 50 locations and 1.50Billion in 2016 sales.
The Company’s Services include Quality Assurance, Kitting and JIT Supply Chain Management.Industries served are commercial aerospace, aviation, defense, energy, pharmaceutical and electronics.
It’s been several years of an endless string of self-made failures that destroyed large amounts of shareholder value.
The Carlyle Group acquired Wesco back in 2006 and took it public in 2011. Since the IPO it’s been a slow steady market and intrinsic value destroying decline. Recent goodwill write-offs are from poor acquisition. This helped drive selling.
Wesco purchased Interfast during 2012 for CDN$134 million cash. Interfast offers fastener-based solutions for a wide range of applications globally. Then, Haas group bought in 2014 for 550M cash.
The Haas Group reported 573.5 million in 2012 revenues as a global provider of chemical supply chain management solutions to the commercial aerospace, airline, military, energy, and other markets. Additionally, margins dropped from the low 20% to current high single digits.
During Q3 2017 earning call management presented slides to explain the current issues and go forward plan. But, analysts on the call were tired of excuses. Scathing comments such as
“Haas (acquisition) has been a disaster”, “has the board hired a banker and is reviewing the present value of what one can achieve today – or the value achieved today versus the present value of your operating plan that you’re developing”. Additional comment made, “how spectacular this thing went off the rails from when the company first went public, it’s remarkable.”
Management’s responded to analysts concerns with the following comments. The
“entire board is committed to doing what’s best for the shareholders, and that includes evaluating any alternative strategies to maximize that long-term shareholder value”. “No. We have not hired a banker yet. And again, my focus is on turning this thing around.” “Our job right now and our focus and our priority is to turn this around”. “I know that the entire board is committed to doing what’s best for the shareholders, and that includes evaluating any alternative strategies to maximize that long-term shareholder value.” “It’s fixable. As I said at the beginning and a couple of times through my prepared remarks, a lot of this is self-inflicted.”
Tangible measures* listed below may hint WAIR is near a market bottom.
Below are favorable summary attributes* with supporting tables
- Tangible net assets grew from 03/2014 negative -104.230M to the MRQ balance of positive 239.121M or an increase of 343.351M. The main driver of this improvement is the 395.592M debt reduction. In contrast, total equity dropped during the same 2014 to MRQ period from 992.290M to 687.810M or a decline of 304.480M. This in comparison to a net tangible increase of 343.351M. The main driver for the equity decline is the intangible/goodwill write-off of 647.831M
- Market over reaction to the downside with a 50% drop in enterprise value from the first fiscal quarter ending March 2014 (3,190.560M) to 08/24/17 (1,605.856M). A mean reverting -44% 52-week price change. Now trades near its 52 week low of $6.95 off 52 week high of $15.77.
- Consistent positive operating and free cash flow going back to 2012. The non-cash charges are the primary drivers impacting reported negative net income.
- Recent material outsized positive insider buying versus historical activity signals conviction coupled with some 2017 activity purchased above the current price.
- In a market of increasing risk, and future value skepticism these value style institutions added shares to their existing WAIR position. David Dreman, founder of Dreman Value Management added shares at $10.26. Barrow Hanley known for their strict adherence to traditional value disciplines added 296,293 shares to its existing position of 464,638 shares at an average price per share of $11.33. Chuck Royce added more share to its existing 2,790,423 share position at the average holding price of $13.87. CARLYLE GROUP holds 23.19% of the total shares outstanding. MAKAIRA PARTNERS owns 9.69% of TSO and added 1,474,630 additional shares during August 2017. MSD CAPITAL (Michael Dell) 5,045,304 shares held or 5.01% of TSO.
- Historical tangible book and revenue valuations improvement.
- The trailing 6 month (03/16 to 06/17) total for gross profit is 517.50M and 367.50 for SGA. This compares favorably to the preceding 6 month rolling period (09/14 to 12/15).See below
Below are the month ending Results:
The TTM revenue of 1,433M is up 37% from 2013 annual revenue of 902M based on 2 acquisitions. Gross profit over the same period increased 15% or 52M.
Valuation for EV/GP was 6.25 for 2013 versus a more favorable 2.13 for the TTM.
Poor integration of two acquisitions mentioned above accelerated SGA far faster than the increase in GP. Hence, negatively impacting operating income. Management committed to improving expense control.
The main risk is further EBITDA decline and then the inevitable violation of loan covenants that use a EBITDA to debt ratio.
But, I believe the stock has favorable probability for a one year or less value trade or the longer holding period to realize potential larger gains with a full turn around and company sale. I initiated a place holder position looking to add shares if the stock moves lower.
This article was originally published on ShadowStock and is reprinted here with permission.
About the Author
Shadowstock’s goal is simple. The persistent pursuit to uncover and share the best ignored investment ideas in the tradition of Graham and Dodd. My academic experience includes a degree in both Accounting and Investment Finance from Baruch College, New York City. Professional experience covers responsibility for financial systems development/management coupled with financial controllership and analysis at Fortune 500 companies. Health issue forced me to leave. My investment posts are nonprofit.
“There Are No Bad Assets Just Bad Prices”