For other posts in the series, follow the links below.
The second method I use to value a stock is by using Benjamin Graham’s formula from The Intelligent Investor.
With the extremely popular free Ben Graham stock spreadsheet I offer, the stock valuation method deserves a closer look.
The original formula from Security Analysis is
where V is the intrinsic value, EPS is the trailing 12 month EPS, 8.5 is the PE ratio of a stock with 0% growth and g being the growth rate for the next 7-10 years.
However, this formula was later revised as Graham included a required rate of return.
The formula is essentially the same except the number 4.4 is what Graham determined to be his minimum required rate of return. At the time of around 1962 when Graham was publicizing his works, the risk free interest rate was 4.4% but to adjust to the present, we divide this number by today’s AAA corporate bond rate, represented by Y in the formula above.
(credit to wikipedia for the formula images)
But intrinsic value shouldn’t be calculated based on a single 12 month period which is why I have the EPS automatically adjusted to a normalized number ignoring one time huge or depressed earnings based on 5 year or 10 year history depending on the company you are looking at.
EPS is never really a good number on its own as it is highly prone to manipulation with modern accounting methods. Another reason why you have to always normalize EPS is because management will never understate earnings on purpose. While companies may follow accounting procedures which inflates earnings, they will never go out of their way to make it lower than it is.
Another variation of the formula will use the projected EPS but unless it is a pure growth stock with exponential growth like characteristics, the stock value will become absurdly high.
EPS by analysts are also always over optimistic, so by following Wall Street guidance, you’re starting off on the wrong foot.
The drawback of the Benjamin Graham formula is that growth is a big element of the overall valuation.
You can change 8.5 to whatever you feel is the correct PE for a no growth company. Depending on your conservativeness, anything between 7 and 8.5 should be fine.
For the actual growth rate, if convenience is important, you could just use the analyst 5yr predictions from Yahoo or other sites, but for most value stocks that I search for, predictability is important so a regression of the historical EPS to project the following year is a method I like to use.
The “2 x G” however, is quite aggressive. So I’ve recently reduced the multiplier to 1.5 instead of 2.
I currently have the stock value spreadsheet set up to use the 20 year A corporate rate which is just above 6%. This provides a slightly more conservative intrinsic value than the 20 year AAA or AA.
So by making the adjustments, the new formula is now
Testing this equation on Microsoft, the inputs are
which results in an Ben Graham intrinsic value of $29.10. Current price as of writing is $29.41.
Results look pretty good, but not all companies are as predictable or stable as MSFT so the stock valuation could be a coincidence.
A growing company DLB.
What about growth story AAPL?
The results aren’t all too bad but obviously, you will need to be careful of your inputs. And never forget margin of safety.
No positions at time of writing.